Your Right to Know: An Interview with Megan Westgate of the Non-GMO Project

A national thought leader on GMO issues and longtime healthy and sustainable food activist/advocate, Megan Westgate helped launch the Non-GMO Project in 2006. She lives with her family on an organic permaculture homestead in the Lake Whatcom watershed in Washington State and is co-author of The Non-GMO Cookbook. In this interview conducted by Arty Mangan of Bioneers, Megan talks about  how, as a young activist, she was drawn to the issue of GMOs and how  the Non- GMO Project is rigorously providing real information to consumers about what’s in their food.

ARTY MANGAN: I first heard you speak at the Eco Farm conference about 15 years ago, and I was really impressed with the Non-GMO Project. Around that time, I served on a Santa Cruz County subcommittee that ultimately resulted in the County Board of Supervisors banning the growing of GMOs in our county, so I was very excited to hear about your work to inform the public about GMOs in food products because then, and even today, the labeling regulations are woefully inadequate in informing people if a food product contains GMOs. What inspired you to do this work? How did you conceive of the idea of testing for GMOs?

 MEGAN WESTGATE: In the early 2000s, I had a handful of experiences that exposed me to the topic of biotechnology and GMOS at a time when it was not a very public conversation. Some of those touchpoints came through work I was doing as a student activist. I had the opportunity to go to a Ruckus Society activist training camp on biotechnology. They were preparing for a big march in Boston that summer, and the GMO issue was just starting to heat up.

As soon as I heard about this idea of manipulating the genes of our food in a laboratory and then releasing it into the wild untested, I became very concerned and realized how important it would be to make sure that we protected our food supply and our living systems from these experiments.

A few years later, I was working at the Food Conspiracy Co-op in Tucson, Arizona, and I heard about an initiative from a retailer in Berkeley and another one in Toronto to work on labeling GMO food. I had seen firsthand in our food co-op that people were coming into the store looking for foods that were non-GMO, and there wasn’t a clear way to tell. Meanwhile, the application of genetic engineering in the core commodity crops, such as corn and soy, was increasing exponentially. Upwards of 80 to 90 percent of those commodity crops were being genetically engineered and those ingredients were being used in so many packaged foods, and no one really knew what was going on.

So, this idea emerged that we could create a standard and a certification system to help the public know which products were non-GMO. I still feel that the fact that this is necessary is pretty ludicrous. The lack of application of the scientific method to the whole process of releasing GMOs into our food supply and into the world is deeply troubling to me; the lack of oversight of the government is concerning. But, on the flip side, I am deeply encouraged by how we, through grassroots activism and public will, have been able to protect the non-GMO food supply in this country despite the corporate money behind developing GMOs and despite of the lack of government oversight. So far, we have been able to protect the non-GMO food supply, and people in North America can now go into a grocery store and easily find non-GMO options.

ARTY: The FDA website claims that extensive research shows that GMOs are just as safe and as healthful as their non-GMO counterparts. What’s the process for a new GMO food to be approved?

MEGAN: There’s almost no regulatory process in place to approve GMOs. The exception to that is something called the Plant Protection Act. Because of the way that traditional transgenic GMOs are developed, they are considered a plant pest because some of them contain genes from Bacillus thuringiensis [a soil bacteria that is a parasite to certain plant pests] and have been engineered to produce insecticide in every cell of the plant.

But the biotech company that produces those GMOs goes through a simple process to show that they’re not a plant pest, and even the ones that probably are still get approved. And that’s it. There is no regulatory process to assess whether they are safe and healthy for people to eat or what their long-term impact on the environment might be. Is this new genetically modified organism going to cause problems for the water supply or soil health? No one knows, because no one is obliged to do that research.

The lack of any application of a genuine scientific process is deeply concerning to me. That process should start with observation and then move into inquiry. None of that has been applied to look at what the impact of releasing a slew of genetically engineered organisms on the living systems of planet Earth, including human health, might be.

ARTY: How often does the FDA reject a new GMO product?

MEGAN: I’m not aware of that happening. And even more concerning is the way the technology is evolving: a lot of genetic engineering is now being applied to things being produced not for crops in the field but in vats inside of warehouses, and those have even less, if any, oversight. Techniques such as gene editing, CRISPR and Synthetic Biology have just about zero regulatory process, so there isn’t even any mechanism for them to be rejected.

ARTY: Michael Hansen, Ph.D., Senior Scientist at Consumer Reports, prior to the Impossible Burger being released, studied how Impossible Burger Inc. used CRISPR to develop the novel protein Leghemoglobin, a molecule that mimics the flavor of beef blood. At a 2016 Eco Farm Conference, Hansen said that the data showed there were unanticipated mutations throughout the genetic sequence of the novel protein. He felt that because of the uncertainties of the potential health risks of those mutations, that there was no way the FDA could rationalize approving the product and yet they did. How are new biotechnologies entering the food system and what are some of the consequences?

MEGAN: One of the things that’s most concerning to me about the new applications of biotechnology is that many of the developers are branding and positioning these products as non-GMO, which is completely inaccurate and unscientific. They’re doing that on the basis of them not being transgenic, meaning that they haven’t combined DNA from multiple different species, which is how GMOs have traditionally been made, and the majority of GMOs coming into the food supply are still coming through transgenic crops. When we started the Non-GMO Project, there were a handful of those crops, and it was relatively easy to track the development of new products because they were being made by just a handful of agrochemical companies, Monsanto being the most widely known.

But Biotechnology is evolving; it’s becoming less expensive and more accessible, and there is a ton of venture capital flowing into it. As a consequence of those combined factors, The Non-GMO Project needs a team of three full-time researchers just to keep track of the new products being developed, and we’re tracking more than 500 biotech companies now, up from just a handful 10 years ago.

These companies recognize that, overall, the majority of consumers in North America don’t want to eat GMOs, so they’re positioning these products as non-GMO, but that’s scientifically inaccurate because they’re still been developed using biotechnology. There is a well-established international definition for what biotechnology is. It’s the definition that we use in our standard. It’s the same definition that’s used by the UN. It’s used in the Cartagena Protocol. All of these new products are incontrovertibly produced using biotechnology, i.e., using in-vitro nucleic acid techniques to alter DNA. It is different than traditional breeding out in a field; it’s manipulating DNA in a laboratory, and whether or not the resulting GMO is transgenic [taking a gene from one species and inserting it into another species], it’s still biotechnology, and anything produced with these techniques is a GMO.

The concern about working in this way, as Michael Hansen has spoken to, is that we’re very far from being able to understand and control DNA sufficiently to make changes like that in our environment and bodies and understand the long-term impact to the entire web of life, so the whole premise is faulty.

Bioneers influenced me in my early years coming out of college and doing activism by helping me be grounded in the sense that we have to look at the interconnectedness of living systems. We have to look at the whole. We can’t only break things down to their constituent parts and think that gives us a full understanding. That’s the essence of colonialist thinking that has been imposed on human beings but also on nature with technologies such as biotechnology and the production of GMOs. It’s hubris to think that we can reduce things in an incredibly complex system into their parts and manipulate those parts and gain full control of the outcome without unintended consequences. We know that that’s absolutely not true. We know that at a scientific level, and many of us also sense it on an intuitive level, that it’s disrespectful and risky to go into living systems and manipulate them in extractive ways.

ARTY: With all the risks and uncertainties you just talked about, let’s discuss the current GMO labeling standard. What is the reality of the national GMO labeling law. Is it really serving consumers and giving them proper information?

MEGAN: The only reason we have any sort of federal GMO labeling in the United States, after many years of there being no movement on it, is because grassroots campaigns built up momentum at a state level for GMO labeling laws. At the time that the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard was passed, there were 54 GMO labeling laws on ballots in 26 states, and in Connecticut, Maine and Vermont labeling laws had successfully been passed. One of the key provisions of the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard was to supersede all of those state laws and roll them back and take away the power they had to actually give eaters/shoppers in those states informed choice about what they were eating. So, the only reason that there was momentum at a federal level is because the biotech industry felt threatened by the transparency that state labeling laws required.

The national law, which supersedes those state labeling laws, provides almost no information to consumers about whether or not there are GMOs in a product.

And perhaps just as bad is the language used to disclose that the product contains GMOs, the word they can use is “bioengineered.” We did a lot of research, as did other groups such as the Center for Food Safety, for example, to find out if “bioengineered” is a term most Americans recognize as having anything to do with GMOs, and the answer is no. Bioengineered has typically been used in the medical space, so they clearly chose language that would obfuscate the truth.

And beyond all of that, only a very narrow subsection of products requires labels. Labels of any kind are only required for products that have testable GMO DNA intact, and for the most part, the testing methods used to identify GMOs at a molecular level are not able to do it accurately once a product has been heavily processed, which, of course, is the case for most packaged foods. That’s why to meet the Non-GMO Project standard we require that testing be done at a point in the supply chain where there is still testable DNA intact.

Another huge loophole with this law is that the majority of GMOs grown in this country are grown for animal feed. For example, the majority of corn, one of the biggest agricultural crops, goes to animal feed and ethanol. That’s why with the Non-GMO Project standard we require testing of animal feed, but that’s completely out of the scope of the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard. So really, the truth is that the national standard does not provide any meaningful insight to consumers as to whether or not a product contains GMOs.

The Non-GMO Project has continued to be really meaningful for shoppers because people know that when they see the Non-GMO Project logo (a butterfly) that real, rigorous testing has been done, that we’ve looked to see if new GMO techniques – such as CRISPR, Synthetic Biology, gene editing, etc. – have been used (because those too are also completely excluded from the  National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard).

ARTY: Enforcement is complaint driven, and if my understanding is correct, the only consequence of violating the regulation is that the FDA will post the violation on their website.

MEGAN: Yes, that’s correct. In the final version of the rule that passed, there were no financial penalties for violation, so basically there are no enforcement provisions. That’s why I say when you look at how meaningless the regulation is overall and at the timing of its passage, it’s crystal clear that its only purpose was to block the meaningful legislation that was getting put into place in certain states.

ARTY: Essentially the Non-GMO Project is taking on the responsibility that the FDA is defaulting on.

MEGAN: It is. And that’s really why we started the Project, because even at the time that the project formed, there had already been years of efforts to get the federal government to do something. In the EU, GMOs have to be labeled. In many countries around the world, governments ensure that citizens can easily see which products have been produced using biotechnology. There were efforts in the United States to get those same protections in place for our citizens, and it’s because they weren’t going anywhere that we started the Non-GMO Project, and where things ultimately landed with the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard confirmed that our best bet was to do this ourseleves, as a consumer movement, so we could define for ourselves what we are concerned about and what information we want to know about each product we consume.

ARTY: Occasionally my wife will come home with a product that’s labeled “GMO free.” And I’ll wonder: “What does that mean? What is their standard?” But when I buy something that’s certified by the Non-GMO Project, I know what that means. What distinguishes the Non-GMO Project’s certification from other labels that make a GMO free claim?

MEGAN: We are a nonprofit organization, and we have the most rigorous and the only third-party standard for GMO avoidance. What that means is we have a standard that’s been developed according to international best practices, and we have public comment periods. There’s a high value placed on transparency and also opportunities to participate in our standard revision processes.

We also have separation of function. We work with accredited testing labs. We work with technical administrators. Everyone has a separate role, and our function as a nonprofit is in setting the standards. it is not the Non-GMO Project itself that directly evaluates products. We contract that out to top notch accredited labs, i.e., an independent, highly respected third party. We set standards, we oversee the implementation of the standards; but there are outside certification experts who do product reviews and assess whether or not they meet our standards. And all the information about who our labs and our technical administrators are, what the requirements are for all of them, and what our standards consist of is all publicly available on our website. There’s nothing like that level of transparency with any other non-GMO certification claims out there.

ARTY: For human food and supplements you have an action threshold for high-risk inputs of less than 1% GMOs. How do you establish that threshold? And what is your response to people who criticize that for not being 100% GMO free?

MEGAN: That threshold is based on what’s in the European Union standard. In the EU, if something is more than .9% GMO, it has to labeled. And because we didn’t have that provision in place at a regulatory level in the U.S., we did the inverse of that and said, well, okay, anything below .9% is our standard.

There’s also a pragmatic element to it. By the time the Non-GMO Project started in 2007, the majority of corn, soy, canola and cotton was already genetically engineered. It had already been released into the environment. Corn is really promiscuous. Its pollen can travel large distances. For someone who is concerned about or doesn’t understand why it’s not zero, picture an organic farmer who’s growing organic corn, and a little bit of pollen with GMOs blows in from their neighbor’s fields. We believe that there should be testing and that GMOs need to be kept under a strict limit, but at the same time, it would be almost impossible, especially with corn, to have a zero limit. You wouldn’t really any food available in the United States that could meet that standard, just because of how widely GMOs are produced.

ARTY: 99.1 % pure is a pretty high standard in this dirty world we live in.

MEGAN: We have the most rigorous standard that anyone has, and it’s not an easy standard to meet. Companies, farmers and processors have done a tremendous amount of work to build a non-GMO supply chain to respond to eater demand. One of the things that inspires me the most, even 20 years into doing this work, is just seeing the power that eaters have to change the way our food is grown and made, and really, from the simple demand of shoppers in grocery stores saying they wanted non-GMO food, it led to this massive shift. We’re getting to 99.1% non-GMO. The work to do that throughout the entire supply chain has been enormous, and it’s happened because of the eater demand. I find that deeply inspiring. It helps me imagine what else can we could do to change our food system simply by being informed and educated, and asking questions.

ARTY: Are you able to detect the use of CRISPR and other newer technologies in your testing?

MEGAN: There are scientists working on developing tests for them, and there are early results showing that gene-edited products can be detected with a fair amount of confidence. The challenge is getting to affordable, commercially viable testing for all of them.

So right now, for the new techniques, we require affidavits, which is why we have three full-time researchers tracking everything. As far as I know, we’re the only organization in the world maintaining this database of all of the developers and all of the products, so that we know where to look and where to ask questions. Without that information and without the testing, it’s pretty much impossible to control for these new GMOs, especially because the developers of these products are positioning them as non-GMO, and that’s happening throughout the supply chain and food industry, so brands, when they’re procuring ingredients, are getting things that are being sold to them that as non-GMO that in fact have been developed using biotechnology, such as synthetic biology products. It takes a lot of work for us in our certification program to do the research and make sure that we’re asking questions where they need to be asked, and getting the paperwork in place that is necessary to have confidence about the non-GMO status.

ARTY: You have taken on some fairly powerful entities. You’re doing the job that the FDA should be doing. I’m sure the biotech industry is not a big fan of the Non-GMO Project. Have you gotten pushback or pressure from any of those entities?

MEGAN: Not directly. I do think that it’s partly because of the approach that we’ve taken. While I certainly have serious concerns and objections and a sense of what is right that is different than what’s happening, we’ve been committed to not being in dualistic mindset of right and wrong and engaging with a fighting energy that often happens in activism, and particularly in non-GMO activism. We’ve made it less about attacking Monsanto and more about affirming that we have a right to know what’s in our food.

People have a right to safe, healthy food. People have a right to feel good about what they’re putting into their bodies and feeding their children. That approach has diffused some of the pushback that might otherwise have been there, because that’s a pretty hard thing to argue with. I believe that increasingly, even more so than when the project started, we’re at a time in human history on planet Earth where divisiveness does not serve us. That doesn’t mean that we don’t need to stand stronger than ever for the things we believe and to speak the truth as we see it, but it also means that we can’t afford to be putting our energy into the drama of fighting. We need to put our energy into creating the reality to support the health of living systems on Earth.

ARTY: How do you assess the impact of the Non-GMO Project on the market?

MEGAN: For me, one of the main things I look at is just how many verified products we have, which at this point is more than 120,000 SKUs [the unique identifying number for each product] that are in the marketplace that have the butterfly on them, and that’s mind-blowing to me, because when we started the project, it really seemed like a long shot. There were entrenched corporate interests that were influencing regulations, that were influencing development, that were influencing public opinion through marketing dollars, and I wasn’t sure that we would ever get our butterfly onto a single product.

I remember in the first few years when we set our goal of getting 10,000 products verified, it seemed so audacious – but it’s good to have audacious goals.  Now, all over North America, people have access to non-GMO choices and to clear information that helps them make those choices.

People have the power to change the way food is grown and made; we have the power to choose new stories. We all have the gift of imagination that can create something new. Food is such an incredible nodal point in the health of people and of living systems on the Earth.  And non-GMO is really just one way of doing that.

The Non-GMO Project is also starting to look at nutrient density and the connection between that and soil health and regenerative agriculture practices. And I’m really excited about what, as eaters, we can continue to dream together for a new future where food is actually nourishing all life.

Design Thinking: An Interview with Marilyn Cornelius

Design thinking is a process of creative problem-solving that is used to bring transformative change to people’s wellbeing or career, or to their chosen cause. In this Q&A with Marilyn Cornelius, we explore the importance of design thinking and how she began her career in the subject. Sign up for the Design Thinking Bioneers Learning course to learn more about how leaders can make innovation a habit.


Marilyn Cornelius

Bioneers: Why is Design Thinking so important for people to learn about right now?

Marilyn Cornelius: It’s a problem-solving process that builds in creativity so anyone can use it for any problem, particularly complex or “wicked” problems where conventional thinking often fails. 

Bioneers: How did your career in Design Thinking begin?

MC: At Stanford University where I took a class in design thinking, then another, and then co-founded a program called Research in Design and began co-facilitating workshops for graduate students, post-doctoral scholars and faculty.

Bioneers: What is one thing that you find particularly fascinating about Design Thinking?

MC: I love the Ideation and Prototyping phases of design thinking because you can come up with tons of ideas and build a 3-D solution in less than 30 minutes total.

Bioneers: Tell us one great reason why people reading this should sign up for your course.

MC: It’s going to be a refreshing journey filled with fun, inventiveness, and integration of methods to help you learn and immediately apply tools to the challenges you’re facing right now. 

Sacred Activism: An Interview with Nina Simons and Deborah Eden Tull

Sacred activism speaks to what inspires, guides and resources us to serve life, while integrating deep listening, collaboration and restoration. In this Q&A with Nina Simons and Deborah Eden Tull, we explore the importance of sacred activism and how they found themselves fascinated by the subject. Sign up for their Sacred Activism Bioneers Learning course to learn more about sacred activism and relational leadership.


Bioneers: Why is Sacred Activism so important for people to learn about right now?

Nina Simons

Nina Simons: We’ve received a culturally entrained bias that inclines us to falsely segregate our relationships with the Sacred and Activism, to our detriment. Now that we’ve entered a time of convergent crises — both ecological and social — that asks so much of us, reconnecting Activism with the Sacred can offer us regenerative energy for the long haul.

Deborah Eden Tull

Deborah Eden Tull: This is an age of collective liminality and change. We face the unknown together, as narratives, stories, assumptions, limiting beliefs, and reliance on systems that human consciousness has invested in for a long time come into question. Many people are feeling powerless today. Sacred activism invites us to embrace a more vast perspective about who we are and how we can respond wholeheartedly to the times we face. 

Sacred activism invites us beyond the limiting confines of ego to embrace our partnership with nature, the more than human realm, and the invisible realm… as we work on behalf of our collective. It’s not just what we do but how we do it. Sacred activism begins from the ground of deep embodied listening — listening within, to one another, to mother earth, and to the world at large.

Bioneers: How did your career in Sacred Activism begin?

NS: Every major career decision in my life — I see now in retrospect — has been motivated by my sense of the Sacred, or by a sense of feeling called to serve a larger purpose that seems fundamentally (but not religiously) spiritual in nature, so it’s been a lifelong practice that I’ve only recently begun to recognize as such.

DET: I come from a family of activists, visionaries, and agents of change. As a young person whose heart was broken by the polycrises inherited by my generation, I had, at the same time, the privilege of being raised in a family mindset dedicated to service.  I witnessed both the power of people dedicated to change, as well as the potential for burnout and self-righteousness. As a Buddhist dharma teacher, my path has been about bridging personal and collective awakening, and helping to nurture a movement of regenerative leadership. In other words, how we treat ourselves and how we treat one another and the earth are the same. 

My passion is bridging the personal, interpersonal, transpersonal, ecological, societal, mystical, global effects of engaged meditation. Over the years, I’ve helped meditators awaken their activism and have helped activists embody mindfulness. We are more powerful change agents when we recognize interbeing, our connection with source, as the ground of all conscious response.

Bioneers: What is one recent learning or piece of inspiration that you find particularly fascinating?

NS: Central to my own worldview is that unless we can alter our culture, we won’t access the power needed to alter our collective course. I believe that combining the Sacred with our definition of Activism can potentize all of our efforts in those directions, and also help to address our current tendency for leaders to over extend their efforts, and burn out. 

DET: Right now I’m drawing great inspiration from the teachings of Harriet Tubman, as celebrated in Spring Washam’s new book about Harriet Tubman’s life. In an age of profound adversity, Harriet modeled spiritual partnership with nature and immeasurable courage, to save hundreds of lives through the Underground Railroad. There are lessons to be learned. The challenges we face today require that we move beyond the shortsightedness and reactivity of the human ego.  It is vital that we move beyond anthropocentrism and egocentrism and tap into the inter-being that gives us access to skillful and collective response. It is vital that we address the polycrises of our times with a deeper, more embodied, imaginative, and interconnected awareness.

Bioneers: Tell us one great reason why people reading this should sign up for your course?

NS: Our Sacred Activism course will open up new pathways and frameworks that can help you to tend to your own nervous system’s equilibrium, to regenerate your sense of commitment to effectively influencing change, and to cultivate a sense of balance and joy within yourself, even while facing the challenges and difficulties that we face.

DET: This course is not about sitting back and receiving more information from the “experts.” This course is not an intellectual or heady training about activism. This series invites your participation in an experiential journey, a heart-based community, and an emergent conversation that may be one of the most important conversations of our times. These are divisive times, and we reclaim shared power through the relational field. We hope that you will join us, with the intention of both strengthening and sharing the unique gifts and medicine that are yours to share in response to the crises we face together as a species.

How to Reject Division and Embrace Belonging

During times of great division, we can easily forget that we are all intricately connected. Can we find a true sense of belonging when we are disconnected from each other and the planet? We must make a conscious effort to lean into connection and community. Only then will we find a sense of belonging and achieve the harmony necessary to solve the issues our world is facing, together.

This week, we’re sharing three presentations about belonging from Yuria Celidwen, john a. powell, and Angela Glover Blackwell.


Want more news like this? Sign up for the Bioneers Pulse to receive the latest news from the Bioneers community straight to your inbox.


Yuria Celidwen – The “Ethics of Belonging” of Indigenous Traditions

“In community we pause, we open, we nourish, and we become.”

Yuria Celidwen is of Nahua and Maya descent from the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico, born into a family lineage of mystics, healers, and poets. Her scholarship centers on Indigenous forms of contemplation and has evolved into a broader perspective she calls the “ethics of belonging.” It has become evident that when we pay attention to the world around us, all we hear is urgency. It is time for community reflection. Yuria shares two core guiding principles from her scholarship, “Kin Relationality” and “Ecological Belonging.” She explains how these concepts can help us access an ever-expansive unfolding of a path of meaning and participation rooted in honoring Life.

Watch Yuria’s Presentation


john a. powell – Belonging without Othering: The Story of our Future

Western culture has for the last several centuries built a society founded on three strong separations: our separation from ourselves, our separation from the other (or the person we call the other), and our separation from the Earth. But, according to john a. powell, one of our nation’s long-time leading experts on civil rights, structural racism, poverty, and democracy, Director of the groundbreaking Othering & Belonging Institute at UC Berkeley, the reality is that we’re not separate. We’re deeply connected to each other. Our challenge is that in order to emerge from the existential crises we face and to birth a far more humane civilization, we now need to look deeply at ourselves and our social structures to overcome the separations that have been inculcated into us for so long and rediscover our fundamental connection to each other and the entire web of life.

Watch john’s Presentation


Creating a World Where Everyone Belongs: From a Change of Heart to System Change

In this moment of radical transformation, shifting the societal pronoun from “me, me, me” to “we” may be the single most transformational pivot we can make in order for anything else to work. Our destiny is ultimately collective. How can we overcome corrosive divisions and separations that are tearing us apart and create a world where everyone belongs?

In this program, we dip into a deep conversation on this topic between Angela Glover Blackwell and john a. powell, two long-time friends and leaders in a quest toward building a multicultural democracy.

Listen to the Podcast


Save the Date for Bioneers 2024!

Mark your calendars for March 28-30, 2024! Bioneers is coming back to Berkeley for our 35th annual conference. More information and early registration access is coming soon.

Sign up for Conference Alerts


Recommended Watch: WILD HOPE

WILD HOPE is a new series of short films that highlights some intrepid change-makers who are restoring our wild places with localized activism, sparking new hope for the future of our planet.

Watch Here


Take This Job and Shove It: The Great Resignation or The Great Revolt?

Labor organizer and Founder of One Fair Wage, Saru Jayaraman, takes us inside one of the fiercest labor struggles to challenge a mighty oligarchy: The food, beverage and restaurant industry. Workers are walking off the job and refusing historically low wages. She says if “we the people” stand with workers as they face this powerful lobby, they can win.

Featuring

Saru Jayaraman, President of One Fair Wage and Director of the Food Labor Research Center at UC Berkeley, co-founded (after 9/11) the Restaurant Opportunities Center (ROC), which grew into a national movement of restaurant workers, employers and consumers. Saru has won many prestigious awards for her advocacy and is the author of four books including: One Fair Wage: Ending All Subminimum Pay in America and Bite Back: People Taking on Corporate Food and Winning.

Credits

  • Executive Producer: Kenny Ausubel
  • Written by: Kenny Ausubel
  • Senior Producer and Station Relations: Stephanie Welch
  • Program Engineer and Music Supervisor: Emily Harris
  • Host and Consulting Producer: Neil Harvey
  • Producer: Teo Grossman
  • Production Assistance: Monica Lopez

Video & Audio Extra!

Find out more about One Fair Wage’s latest campaign 25 by 250 which launched in 2022, “to raise wages and end subminimum wages in 25 states by the United States’ 250th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence in 2026. Today, and each year, we’re declaring independence from so many things including: Poverty, racism, homophobia, sexism, sexual harassment, income inequality, legacies of slavery, and having to rely on tips and the whims of customers to survive in America.”
We need #OneFairWage now. #OFW25x250

This is an episode of the Bioneers: Revolution from the Heart of Nature series. Visit the radio and podcast homepage to find out how to hear the program on your local station and how to subscribe to the podcast.

Subscribe to the Bioneers: Revolution from The Heart of Nature podcast


Transcript

Neil Harvey (Host): In this program, the labor organizer and Founder of One Fair Wage, Saru Jayaraman, takes us inside one of the fiercest labor struggles to challenge a mighty oligarchy: The food, beverage and restaurant industry. She poses this question: If you work full-time, shouldn’t you be able to have enough money to feed your children, pay the rent and cover your basic costs?

I’m Neil Harvey. This is “Take This Job and Shove It: The Great Resignation or The Great Revolt?” with Saru Jayaraman.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office in 1933 in the freefall of the Great Depression, he faced off against a powerful oligarchy. The Industrial Revolution had created vast new American fortunes that organized themselves into bloated monopolistic cartels and waged war against workers.

The result was oligarchy: the concentration of political power of, by and for the wealthy.

When their runaway greed crashed the economy in 1929, a quarter of the population was left unemployed and bereft. A third of those working could get only part-time jobs with radically reduced wages.

FDR sought to save capitalism from the capitalists. He promised the American people a New Deal. The government passed historic progressive legislation and programs such as Social Security, unemployment insurance and the beginnings of a welfare social safety net.

Workers’ rights became law and practice: the right to collective bargaining, the 8-hour day and 40-hour work week, worker’s compensation, and the prohibition of child labor.

In 1936 in his re-nomination speech at the Democratic Convention, FDR said this: “An old English judge said, ‘Necessitous men are not free men.’ Liberty requires opportunity to make a living. For too many of us, the political equality we once had was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of government. ”

Yet the battle raged on, and the oligarchic forces have relentlessly sought to roll back these New Deal Reforms ever since.

As the billionaire Warren Buffett summed it up, “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”

Like the 1930s, once again today the extreme wealth inequality and stranglehold of corporate power that catalyzed the New Deal are precipitating a re-awakening of labor and economic justice movements, in the US and around the world.

At the forefront of these movements is Saru Jayaraman. She is a tireless labor organizer and acclaimed academic as Director of the Food Labor Research Center at UC Berkeley. She has written four books, including One Fair Wage: Ending All Subminimum Pay in America.

Saru Jayaraman spoke at a Bioneers conference.

Saru Jayaraman (SJ): We’re in a really incredibly historic, inspiring, just upheaval moment of worker revolt in this country. And I don’t know how many of you are aware of it, I’m going to share what’s going on. So let me first share a little bit about me and the history of this issue. I’ve been working on raising wages and working conditions in the restaurant and service sector for over 20 years now. Getting older. [LAUGHS]

But the reason this is my life’s work, the reason why this is important is that the restaurant and food service sector has been one of the largest and fastest growing private sector employers in the United States for decades. It was 14 million workers pre-pandemic. That was one in 10 American workers pre-pandemic. But it’s been the absolute lowest paying employer for generations, dating back to Emancipation when the restaurant industry first demanded the right to hire newly freed slaves, newly freed Black people and didn’t want to pay them anything; they wanted to continue non-chattel slavery. They wanted to get free Black labor.

And so they took this notion that had just come from Europe at the time to the United States called tipping. Tipping in Europe had always been an extra bonus on top of a wage. They took that notion which had just come to the US and they mutated it from being an extra bonus on top of a wage to becoming the entirety of a Black person’s wage in the United States. They said, “I’m not going to pay you, but you’re going to have the wonderful fortune of getting to get these white people’s tips.” And so they did.

Saru Jayaraman speaking at Bioneers 2023

They created a system in which tipping was the only income for a workforce that was mostly Black women. In 1919, an entity was formed to make sure this policy, this idea that these workers got only tips, stayed in place, called the National Restaurant Association. We call them the other NRA. [LAUGHTER] They were founded in 1919 with this express mission and intent. In 1938, they made it the law. When everybody else got the federal minimum wage as part of the New Deal in 1938, these workers were mostly women, Black women, were left out and told you get nothing, you just get tips. And we went from 0 dollars in 1938 to the extraordinary $2.13 cents an hour, the current federal minimum wage in the United States of America for what I just told you is one of the largest workforces, in fact the number one fastest-growing workforce, the number two largest private sector workforce in America, legally gets to still pay at the federal level, $2.13 an hour.

And while California is one of seven states that rejected this system many decades ago, most states – 43 states in the US – still have a wage for these workers that is under five bucks an hour. So New Mexico is $2, and Pennsylvania is $2.83, and Massachusetts is still at $5. It’s a shame! It’s a shame in 2023 that America gets to still allow this industry, which is essentially telling Americans we shouldn’t have to pay our workers, you the customer should pay our workers’ wages for us through your tips.

Host: Today, wealth in the US is already over two times as concentrated as it was in Imperial Rome, which was a slave-and-farmer society. In this age of the precariat, at least 50% of Americans can’t afford an unexpected $500 emergency. Over half a million Americans annually file for bankruptcy from medical debt. And it keeps getting worse.

As if economic and workplace conditions weren’t already bad enough, then came the 2020 Covid pandemic. Slamming the economy into shock, it was an extinction-level event for small and medium-sized businesses. Six million restaurant workers lost their jobs almost overnight. Many others quit in what became known as “The Great Resignation.”

Suddenly a new term was coined: “essential” workers.

SJ: We started a relief fund – 300,000 workers came to us for relief, and two-thirds of them told us they actually couldn’t get unemployment insurance because in most states they were told that subminimum wage of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 dollars in Connecticut, too low to qualify for benefits. They were disqualified from getting unemployment insurance.

Then they went back to work in the summer of 2020 before they felt safe. You know, CDC named restaurants the most dangerous place for adults to be during the pandemic. UCSF named restaurants the most dangerous place to work above hospitals. A third of the workers we surveyed said somebody in the restaurant died due to COVID. Very dangerous place to work but they didn’t get unemployment insurance, so millions of workers went back to work in the summer of 2020, when some of us started to try outdoor dining. They found tips had gone way down because sales were down, and harassment way up. We already had the highest rates of harassment.

And when they were told to enforce COVID protocols on the same people from whom they had to get tips to make up their base wages, they were done. They were done – 1.2 million workers have left this industry, and of those who remain, 60% say they are leaving. More than half of the current restaurant workforce in California across the country says they are leaving; 80% says the only thing that would make them stay or come back is a full livable wage with tips on top. That’s why I say historic. [APPLAUSE]

For the first time since Emancipation, millions of workers are walking off the job and saying, “Take your job and shove it!” And thousands of restaurants across the country miraculously, many of whom fought us and told us it can’t be done and you’ll put us out of business, are suddenly paying $15, $25, and $30. In Dallas, they were paying $2.13. That’s the wage in Texas. We’re seeing restaurants in Dallas paying $25 an hour, plus tips. [APPLAUSE] In Massachusetts, in Massachusetts the wage has been $5 an hour. Cape Cod restaurants we’re seeing paying $50 plus tips. We are seeing— Pennsylvania, the wage is $2.83. We saw Applebee’s offering 20 bucks in Quakertown, Pennsylvania, because they cannot find people willing to work for these wages anymore. [APPLAUSE]

Host: Saru Jayaraman first became inspired to do labor organizing after 9/11 when 250 immigrant workers in the restaurant atop the World Trade Center died in the attack. The survivors and families started fighting for better working conditions for their profession.

When Saru learned there was no organization or union to fight for workers’ rights in that sector, she co-founded the Restaurant Opportunities Center or ROC United. She also founded One Fair Wage to end all subminimum wages in the US.

ROC United went on to launch a campaign that resulted in a major victory in Washington D.C. 76% of DC voters voted to raise the wage for tipped workers from $5 to $16.75 – a 300% increase.

ROC United also campaigned against companies deducting credit card processing fees from worker’s tips and got a bill passed in Philadelphia to make it illegal. They’re now working to make it federal law.

As ROC advanced legislation and ballot measures in 15 states to raise the minimum wage, the oligarchic backlash grew increasingly savage.

One feature of oligarchy is to install the best politicians money can buy. Couple that with anti-labor judges and courts that define money as free speech, and it’s one dollar, one vote. Do the math.

Saru Jayaraman spoke on a panel at a Bioneers Conference.

SJ: There’s this overwhelming euphoria that we’re in a moment of worker power, but the sadness is, even in a moment of worker power, I cannot get some of these state legislators and sometimes federal legislators as well, to even follow where the market is heading. The market is driving wages up, and the state legislators are still stuck in small business. What’s it going to do for small business? Business, business, business, business. That’s what’s changed so dramatically, it’s been such a hard fight for so long. We’ve been trying to move these things. Every time we put it on the ballot, everywhere we win, because frankly red states, blue states, we’ve had people with Confederate T-shirts walk up to us and sign our petitions for $15 and $18 and $20, because everybody in America, most people in America – not the elected officials or the elite circles they run in – but most people in America agree, no matter what state they live in, no matter their political spectrum, if you work, you should be able to have enough money to feed your children and pay the rent and cover your basic costs. Most people believe that. There is no future unless working people’s needs are addressed. [APPLAUSE]

We are the majority. We are the frickin’ majority, the overwhelming number of people in America agree on a wide variety of things. We are not polarized from each other. We are polarized from elected officials who pretend that we are polarized from each other. [CHEERS] [APPLAUSE] And they use that idea of polarization to drive their political agendas.

And so what gives me hope is the potential for issues like this, bread and butter issues, to bring people together, and once they come together, with the Confederate flag and the folks from Cleveland – and I’ve seen it in a room – there’s the possibility to talk about things like race, and slavery, and the history of this country. But the first step is we come together around something we fundamentally agree on, which is everybody who works in this country should be paid.

Host: In 1944 , a year before his death, FDR went on to propose a Second Bill of Rights to complement the political rights won by the American Revolution. He called it an Economic Bill of Rights, because, he said, “True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence.”

It included rights such as:

  • Gainful employment
  • An adequate income for food, shelter and recreation
  • Decent housing
  • Education
  • Adequate medical care
  • Social Security
  • And freedom from unfair competition and monopolies

After the 2008 financial crash catalyzed the Occupy Wall Street movement, it also spawned a renaissance of union organizing. Some of the biggest strikes in history ignited, including the Fight for $15 and 672,000 teachers striking in 21 states.

Yet even in a time of rising worker actions and power, the restaurant industry still towers among the most powerful political forces in statehouses and Washington DC – and it’s bipartisanship in action.

SJ: We just issued a report. 1960 was the first time New York state ever even had a minimum wage. Since that time until today, every time the minimum wage has gone up, tipped workers – who are overwhelmingly women, women of color – have gone down as everybody else went up. We’ve always been the let’s just throw these women under the bus so everybody else gets a raise, over and over and over again. In 2016, when everybody else got $15 an hour in New York state, tipped workers’ wages went down from 83% of the wage to 66% of the wage, a 25% decline in their wages, when everybody else went up. By Democrats! It’s when it happens on the left and they—or I don’t even know if you call it the left, but the other side of the aisle. [LAUGHTER] Right? And they’re supposed to be for working people, and they even are for working people, everybody except you. Because you are up against the most entrenched, powerful trade lobby that there is among the employers.

Host: When we return, we hear how Saru Jayaraman and ROC United took on the lobby that compels workers to pay for their own wage suppression – how a living wage curbs sexual harassment – and how we the people can fulfill an Economic Bill of Rights.

I’m Neil Harvey. You’re listening to The Bioneers…

Host: As Bob Dylan famously sang, “Money doesn’t talk, it swears.”

Between 2007 and 2022, the 20 top food industry associations contributed a whopping $33.7 million to federal candidates. Since 2008, they’ve bankrolled $303.2 million to lobby federal agencies and lawmakers. Just three titanic trade groups including the National Restaurant Association have accounted for almost half of these lobbying dollars.

You may not have heard of this “other NRA,” because that’s the way it wants it. As the second largest food industry funder of political campaigns, it means business, says Saru Jayaraman.

SJ: Turns out, about a decade ago, they came to California and Illinois and Texas and Florida, the four largest restaurant industry states, and they got a bill passed in California. It was actually State Senator Alex Padilla at that time who passed the bill, that said every worker in the state of California that works in food service shall be required to take food safety training, and it just so happens the other NRA owns the monopoly food safety training company ServSafe.

So for the last decade, millions and millions of the lowest wage workers in California have been required to pay this food safety training. The other NRA takes that money and then has ballooned their lobbying budget to lobby against those same workers’ wage increases without those workers knowing about it. Millions of workers across this country have been funding their own wage suppression for decades without them knowing about it.

And there are lots of bad lobbies, y’all. There’s fossil fuels, there’s Walmart, there’s the Retail Association. There’s lots of bad lobbies. This lobby took it to another level. They said not only are we going to lobby against people’s interests, we’re going to use those people’s money to lobby against their own interest. How sadistically genius is that?

Saru Jayaraman speaking at a Bioneers 2023 panel

And with that money and power, totaling about $80 million in revenue a year, they have held a stranglehold on both Democrats and Republicans for decades. And pre-pandemic it was so hard for us. We kept fighting to raise these workers’ wages and we’d win. We won on the ballot in DC. We won on the ballot in Maine. We won in Michigan. Each time the Restaurant Association would use its millions of dollars to convince legislators, often Democrats, to overturn the will of the people.

And beyond that. They went after me. They put my children’s pictures up on attack websites. They follow me around the country. They send me death threats. It’s been 21 years of attack, attack, attack, bullies, bullies with so much money – by the way, that they’ve stolen from low-wage workers to fight this fight.

Host: In the class warfare of oligarchy, the story of the battle is also the battle of the story. Controlling the narrative through mass media and disinformation is a lynchpin of maintaining the corporate power structure. Expect to get framed.

One notorious character who pressures people like Saru to back down is the food, beverage and alcohol industry’s fearsome go-to PR hatchet man…

SJ: If you’ve not heard of Richard Berman, I really encourage you to go look up a 60 Minutes special. I think it’s still on YouTube, and it literally is Dr. Evil. That’s the name of the—that’s the name of the clip on 60 Minutes, because he calls himself Dr. Evil. He was a hired goon. This is a guy who’s almost seven feet tall, hired mobster, basically, for big tobacco for years, and then became the hired goon for restaurants and for food. And this man created attack websites, like I said, put my children’s pictures up on them, took out full-page ads in Wall Street Journal, USA Today, driving people to these websites. Wherever I went, he had a digital ad truck follow me around with a website condemning me. And worse, went after funders or celebrities or anybody who would work with us, went to their homes, bullied them, pressured them—you know, went to some foundation funders’ homes to tell them not to fund us, tried to hack into a foundation website to stop a grant to us, almost got our IRS status revoked.

Then when Trump was in office, these are—He is a member of the restaurant association, so they were trying to shut us down for the whole Trump administration. I take so much pride in all of that, because who am I? I’m like a little flea. [LAUGHS] And they’re this behemoth organization, and for them to spend that much money trying to squash me, something I’m doing is right. [APPLAUSE]

Host: For Saru Jayaraman, it’s very personal. As she works with ROC United in the national fight for a living wage, she’s doubly dedicated to that goal because providing a living wage is key to ending sexual harassment in the restaurant industry.

As the mother of two girls, aged 10 and 13, Saru made a vow that by the time her daughters were old enough to work in restaurants: there would be such drastic transformation in the industry that they would no longer have to endure what so many women suffer through every day just trying to eke out a meager living…

SJ: Everywhere I go, more than one in two people in America have worked in restaurants. And for those of us that are women who’ve worked in restaurants, the trauma of especially living off of tips, and having to put up with anything and everything the customer does to you. You know, young women being told, show more cleavage, dress more sexy, wear tighter clothing so you can make more money in tips, and then during the pandemic, show your face.

I worked with Catharine MacKinnon who’s the professor who coined the term sexual harassment, worked on it, is very legendary law professor, and she has said there’s no industry in the United States with higher levels of sexual harassment than tipped workers in the restaurant industry, including the military, she said. And she said there’s actually no policy she’s ever seen as more effective at cutting it than paying these women an actual wage so that they don’t have to live on the tips from customers, she said, including by the way—she thinks it’s more effective than making sexual harassment illegal, which was her life’s work.

Host: If, as FDR said, “True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence,” then perhaps an Economic Bill of Rights is unfinished business whose time has come. Saru Jayaraman believes these so-called bread-and-butter issues are also the gateway to solving the larger constellation of political crises bedeviling the nation and the world.

She points to the story of a woman leader in ROC United’s office in Washington DC. Already fed up with making $5 an hour, the bartender finally walked away after one last straw landed on a haystack of last straws…

SJ: During the pandemic, a customer came to the bar and said, “Take off your mask; I want to see your face.” She said, “No, I’m sorry, my manager won’t let me.” He said, “I guess we know who’s not going to eat tonight.” That is how customers in so much of the country, you may or may not believe it, see servers. They see them as servants, not as servers. Right? And she left. She left the industry during the pandemic because of things like that. I just—I can’t do it anymore. And she was interviewed by CNN, and she said, “Listen, it’s not a great resignation, it’s a great revolution. We know our worth. We know we’re worth more than $2, or $3, or $4, or $5.”

And they’re winning in the market, if we were to help collectively then institutionalize their gains through policy to say not only are you winning $15 and $20 in the marketplace, but we’re going to stand with you and support you and make that the law. We could also then allow them to have the capacity and wherewithal to say, “I also deserve a livable planet; I also deserve bodily autonomy; I also deserve the safety for my children to go to school and not get shot; I also deserve a safe, prosperous life, like everybody else.” And act out their worth on every other issue.

There will never be the political will in this country to truly win on those issues at the scale we need to win them to save our planet if we don’t address the needs of working people, because working people [APPLAUSE] are the majority of this country – 30 million people, 30 million people still earn under $15 an hour, 30 million people. A third of working people are still working and living in poverty. And we cannot shame them and expect them to vote and go knock on their door and say, what’s wrong with you, unless we address their basic needs.

And that is why I’m here pleading with you to say let us not fight in silos. Let us work together. Let us support these workers in their massive revolt, [and] allow them to support all of us as we change the politics of this country.

Ultimately, ultimately, that we the people, that we the people decide for us, do we say as a country that corporations and the National Restaurant Association, the Rifle Association and fossil fuels, and Monsanto, do they control this country? Do they decide what our future is in the next 250 years? Or is it we the people? I know—I know if we support these workers, it can be we the people who win. Thank you. [APPLAUSE]

Mindful Foraging

by Mia Andler

Originally from Finland, Mia Andler has studied the regenerative practices of earth-based cultures around the world. In this excerpt from her second book, The Sierra Forager, Your Guide to Edible Wild Plants of the Tahoe, Yosemite, and Mammoth Regions, Mia shares her expertise in wild plants and her ethos for harvesting them respectfully.

How to Forage with Respect

I invite you to sample this amazing Sierra taste that I’m talking about, but also to pause and consider the impact of your choices when you set out to enjoy the plants of the Sierra, especially if you are a visitor. So many people come to enjoy the splendors of Tahoe and the Sierra that if every one of them picked just one rare edible flower, it could exacerbate the challenges already faced by our remaining native flora in the face of development and climate change. This is something to be aware of especially in the Yosemite region, which already has an overabundance of traffic. I just ask that you stop for a minute right now and promise me that you will learn from this book to harvest with utmost care only for your own purposes, because our wild plants are a shared resource that we all must tend to and protect. If you do want to start a plant-focused foraging business, please harvest invasives only, or plant a wild garden!

When you are foraging on wild lands, watch your step just as you would if you were in your garden. I was once part of a film shoot for a travel channel where I was talking about juicy miner’s lettuce. While I pointed out the plant, another forager stepped on several patches, effectively killing the plants. Don’t do that, please. This is our big garden—you wouldn’t step on the tomatoes you grew with great care, would you?

I have included a sustainability section in each plant description to indicate when a plant is abundant and can be readily foraged in most places, or when it is more sensitive and should only be sampled, not collected in bulk. I have intentionally left out some rare wild edibles, because part of being a respectful forager is knowing where we can do harm and holding back. Even an abundant plant population can be overharvested.

So unless you’re harvesting invasives and you are being part of the solution of restoring our wild meadows and forests, please only take what you need or a small sample. When you do harvest invasive plants, such as salsify, dandelion, and mullein, please be careful not to spread their seed. (Most plants are best eaten before seeding anyway.)

With all this said, I believe that knowing about the uses and edibility of our local plants is extremely important. That is why I’ve written this book.

Fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium. Photo by Mia Andler

Mindful Foraging

We have already lost too much of the deep knowledge allour ancestors carried. We can only restore it collectively. I believe that

knowledge and connecting with the plants through eating them will be an essential part of restoring and protecting our local landscapes. I also hope to see us integrate a lot more local foods into our diet again—for our own good and the good of the environment. Food plants adapted to local conditions often require far fewer inputs and energy and cause far less environmental damage than introduced species. If we find that a plant we want to eat is dwindling in numbers, I hope that discovery will serve as our call to action to restore it to abundance.

We humans have a great capacity for taking care of this earth. Foraging can connect us to place and inspire that caretaking. My hope is that you will proceed with that attitude. “Leave it better than you found it” is my motto. Pick up some trash, pour some water on a patch of plants you harvested from, and remember to say thank you.

Horsetails, Equisetum spp. Photo by Mia Andler

Ethics and Rules of Foraging

The following are some general foraging rules I like to go by for any location:

  • Don’t harvest a plant that is the only one or one of only a few of its kind in that spot.
  • An often-repeated foraging rule is never to harvest more than one-third of the entire quantity. In my opinion, however, one-third is far too much; I would suggest more like one-seventh.
  • Watch how the animals engage with the plants. Don’t harvest something that wildlife clearly prefer.
  • Consider the current condition and health of the plants.
  • Don’t harvest struggling plants at drought time or in the winter.

Most public lands have rules with regard to foraging. Please make sure you look into those before foraging on public land. Here are a few specific regulations relevant to the Sierra:

In the California State Parks, harvesting of wild foods is severely restricted: “No person shall willfully or negligently pick, dig up, cut . . . any tree or plant or portion thereof, including but not limited to . . . flowers, foliage, berries, fruit, grass . . . shrubs, cones, and dead wood, except in specific units when authorization by the District Superintendent or Deputy Director of Off-Highway Motor Vehicles to take berries, or gather mushrooms, or gather pine cones, or collect driftwood is posted at the headquarters of the unit to which the authorization applies.” Some exceptions may exist, so check the rules before you go.

In national forests, which are federal lands run by the US Forest Service, in general harvesting “incidental amounts”—often defined as one gallon—of mushrooms and berries for personal use is allowed without a permit. Check the rules for your specific national forest. Harvesting from wilderness areas is prohibited.

With regard to Yosemite National Park, the following fruits may be gathered by hand for personal consumption, up to one pint per person per day for immediate consumption: blackberries, raspberries, elderberries, strawberries, thimbleberries, and huckleberries. Himalayan blackberries can be gathered in unlimited quantity. You can read the rules in more detail at Yosemite’s website.

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land and national wildlife refuges may be more permissive. If you intend to forage on private land, it is prudent to ask the permission of the owner.

Repairing Relationships, Healing the Land and Feeding People

By Benjamin Fahrer

Benjamin Fahrer is the Director of Agroecology and Land Stewardship for the Deep Medicine Circle, an organization dedicated to healing the wounds of colonialism through food, medicine, restoration and learning. He is also the founder of Top Leaf Farms, which designs and builds innovative, ecological rooftop farming systems (including Garden Village on top of a UC Berkeley student housing complex). Benjamin has worked in a number of places in California and New Zealand as a land designer and farmer, including at The Esalen Institute in Big Sur, Oceansong Farm and Wilderness Center in Sonoma County, and the Solar Living Institute in Hopland, CA.

These are edited excerpts from a presentation Benjamin delivered at the Bioneers Conference as well as from a subsequent interview:

Benjamin Fahrer is the Director of Agroecology and Land Stewardship for the Deep Medicine Circle, an organization dedicated to healing the wounds of colonialism through food, medicine, restoration and learning. He is also the founder of Top Leaf Farms, which designs and builds innovative, ecological rooftop farming systems (including the Rooftop Medicine Farm – 1 acre rooftop in Oakland and  Garden Village on top of a UC Berkeley student housing complex). Benjamin has worked in a number of places in California and New Zealand as a land designer and farmer, including at The Esalen Institute in Big Sur, Oceansong Farm and Wilderness Center in Sonoma County and the Solar Living Institute in Hopland, CA. These are edited excerpts from a presentation Benjamin delivered at the Bioneers Conference as well as from a subsequent interview

I have lived and worked in some amazing rural places before I met my amazing wife, Rupa Marya, who is a doctor at UC San Francisco, a musician, an artist, a healer, and a mobilizer. She has taught me so much and mobilized me for the movement. Because of Rupa, I’m now an ally to help deconstruct colonial capitalism for the betterment of collective health. She challenged me: What if we grew food at scale where people actually lived and made a real impact?” To do that, she moved me to the city, and since then urban agriculture has fascinated me. 

I have been inspired by many people working in this area of Urban Agriculture such as Michael Ableman who runs Sole Food Street Farm in Vancouver providing jobs for people experiencing homelessness, and the Brooklyn Grange which enhances urban ecologies by building rooftop farms and green spaces in their city. The amazing work they are doing in New York with their rooftop farms inspired me to create Top Leaf Farms with an added goal of rewilding our urban centers with regenerative agriculture. 

Why do we leave the city so much to go out in nature? What happens when we go out into the wild? We are brought into awe and wonder.  It’s a place we go to seek inspiration. Cities are not designed for wildness. That space is usually pushed away. But what if we started designing for wildness in our cities? I believe that if we did that, our cities would be more inspiring to live in, and we could grow our food in those same spaces.

What does it take to design and build an urban ecosystem centered around a farm with food as the byproduct? The opportunity presented itself when a developer asked me if it was possible to farm the roof of their building in Berkeley. The answer was Yes and then they asked if I could design, build and operate the roof of Garden Village, a UC Berkeley student housing complex. This would be  my first rooftop project. There are 16 different rooftops, 18 total towers in the complex, so it was a pretty big and complicated urban space, but the developer believed in what I was doing. He said, “You can farm this roof, I know you can, what do you need?”

That was 10 years ago. It took 2 years to complete the design, planning and permitting. I first had to figure out what I needed to learn. How is the roof built? How do you build soil on a rooftop? We were limited by weight which meant we could only have  8 to 12 inches of soil. Growing and harvesting extracts nutrients from the soil, but to replenish it we can’t keep building more and more soil because a roof can only handle so much weight. So, we had to design our own soil blend with stable carbon, which we did with Bio-char. And to allow it to really come alive, we developed a mycelium web, the highway for nutrients to travel.  

We were in the process of trying to figure out how we were going to replicate these systems, when I gave a tour, and Christian Macke, a landscape architect, came up to me afterwards and said: “ I love what you’re doing. I came to the Bay Area with my firm to grow food but they didn’t go in that direction, so I went off on my own. I’d love to partner with you.” Christian took over the drawings and support on project management and as a team we wanted to show how rooftop farming could be built at a reasonable cost. On our 1-acre rooftop in Oakland we were able to build it for half the cost because we managed the build out with systems that are simple and highly functional.

The Rooftop Medicine Farm, operated by the non-profit Deep Medicine Farm, is one-acre in size and is the largest rooftop farm on the West Coast. The roofs are planted mostly with leafy greens and highly productive crops. We rotate the crops and intercrop using different plants with white Dutch clover in the pathways. We inject compost tea into the fertigation system and have planted wind screens that attract beneficial insects. After about a year-and-a-half, hawks, nesting birds and butterflies started using the space as their home; it’s a haven.

It has also become a home for the community. We started doing pop-up dinners and kitchens and other events. There are multiple ways that rooftop farming can benefit developers, communities, and the climate. We have designed and built over 50,000 sf in the Bay Area. Last year the Rooftop Medicine farm grew 20,000 pounds of food for the local community in Oakland. This year we hope to exceed that. The food from Deep Medicine Circle goes to the communities in the East Bay: People’s Program, Poor Magazine, Mom’s 4 Housing, UCSF Children’s Hospital, and EFAM.

The idea of farm-centric housing and “agri-hoods” (neighborhoods centered around a community farm) is an approach to re-imagining our food system integrated into where we live. The DMC Farming is Medicine Initiative’s mission is that no one goes hungry.

Top Leaf Farms has recently partnered with the Deep Medicine Circle, a collaborative dedicated to repairing the relationships that have been fractured through colonialism. DMC runs two farms: The Rooftop Medicine Farm in Oakland and TeKwa A’naa Warep, on the coast south of San Francisco.  Farming is Medicine is rooted in righting relationship with the indigenous community and is a “land-return” food justice project. We are working with the Ohlone Indigenous community to help break the historical patterns of colonial capitalism and to reimagine land use and agriculture in a way that advances racial, climate, health and economic justice goals. We’ve been working with the Indigenous community for over 10 years with a goal of returning land into Indigenous leadership. 

Highly traumatized Indigenous communities have not been supported by the  reckoning on the scale that needs to happen. They’re fighting to get land back; they’re fighting for recognition; they’re fighting for a voice. How can we support this and reach out and do it in a way that’s healing and restorative? How do we create a multi-cultural connection to be in right relationship with this stolen land? It’s not necessarily about returning land for complete Indigenous sovereignty and then we leave. It’s figuring out how we work on this together. It’s a difficult task. 

In working towards a resilient culture, I believe that begins with a reckoning of what we’ve done as a culture. We’ve stolen land, we’ve polluted the land and done a lot of harm to indigenous people. Apology and forgiveness need to happen as well as a return of stolen land and a welcoming back. The trauma of the past is something we all need to reckon with. I’m witnessing the trauma of others and myself  that gets triggered through this process. It takes a lot of effort; there’s a lot of work that needs to be done. 

Buckminster Fuller said that in order to make change we have to create a whole new system that makes the current one obsolete. So, at Deep Medicine Circle we began to develop the “farming-is-medicine” model based around the idea that healthy food is a human right. It’s a holistic practice that has the intent of making colonial capitalism of our food obsolete. Through the lens of “farming as medicine,” we value farmers as healthcare providers, as stewards of the soil and of our health. Deep Medicine Circle has a number of initiatives. Its main goal is healing the relationships that have been fractured through the patterns of colonial capitalism. We do that through story, art, farming and healing, and by working with a number of other groups to create a toolkit that other communities and municipalities can replicate, so that we can make food free as a public health charter. No one should go hungry.   

World Oceans Day: Explore the Sounds of the Sea

In Jacques Cousteau’s words, ours is a “water planet,” one where seas cover 71% of the terrestrial surface, play the key role in regulating the climate and maintaining a breathable atmosphere, and provide a major source of nutrition to billions of people. And yet we know less about many aspects of marine life and the dynamics of how ocean currents and chemistry impact life on Earth than we do about much of the Solar System. Given how badly our species has treated the ocean and its creatures, at great risk to our own survival and wellbeing, it is critical that humanity mobilize itself to understand and protect this most vital of all ecosystems.

In that spirit, we invite you all to celebrate World Oceans Day by hearing from some leading activists and brilliantly innovative researchers who have devoted their lives to studying and defending our “water planet.”


Want more news like this? Sign up for the Bioneers Pulse to receive the latest news from the Bioneers community straight to your inbox.


Marine Mammal Conservation & How Activists Saved the Dolphins

The extreme ill effects of human activity in the ocean have been documented for decades. From irresponsible fishing techniques and oil spills to plastic pollution and global warming, the havoc humanity has brought to marine life has threatened entire species. How can we turn the tide and begin to protect what we have previously harmed?

Dave Phillips is a Co-Founder of the Earth Island Institute and Director of its International Marine Mammal Project. In this conversation, Dave discusses the ways in which he’s seen and participated in marine conservation initiatives that have saved the lives of millions of animals, and he addresses the work that still must be done.

Read More


The High Seas Treaty: 2 Expert Perspectives

After almost 20 years of negotiations, United Nations member countries have agreed upon an international treaty to protect oceans that lie outside national borders. This “High Seas Treaty,” which took substantive steps toward adoption on March 4, 2023, is being heralded as making enormous progress toward protecting marine life, if it is credibly enforced. Conservation experts and ocean activists Rod Fujita and Dave Phillips share their reactions to and concerns about the treaty.

Read More


Save the Date for Bioneers 2024!

Mark your calendars for March 28-30, 2024! Bioneers is coming back to Berkeley for our 35th annual conference. More information and early registration access is coming soon.

Sign up for Conference Alerts


Protecting Our Life Support System: Challenges and Opportunities in Marine Conservation

World-renowned National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence Enric Sala launched the National Geographic Pristine Seas project in 2008 to explore and help inspire the protection of the last wild places in the ocean, an absolutely critical last-ditch effort to prevent the complete unraveling of global marine ecosystems. Made up of an extraordinary team of scientists, conservationists, filmmakers and policy experts, Pristine Seas has helped protect 6 million square kilometers of ocean habitat. Partnering with 122 different organizations and agencies across 23 countries, its work has inspired the establishment of some of the largest marine reserves in the world. In this presentation, Enric discusses the vital importance of healthy oceans to humanity’s future and what Pristine Seas hopes to accomplish in the years ahead.

Watch Enric Sala’s Presentation


Unlocking the Cultural Secrets of Sperm Whales with Shane Gero

Whale researcher Shane Gero shares his experiences studying sperm whales and emphasizes how fundamentally similar their lives are to our own and how their cultures define their identity. Shane explores the influence of culture in shaping individuals and societies, highlighting the role of language and cultural norms in both human and animal interactions. He advocates for a shift in wildlife conservation, urging humans to include cultural diversity as an essential component of biodiversity and to learn from whales’ powerful sense of community.

Read More


Underwater Soundscapes: What Can We Learn by Listening? Meet GLUBS

The Global Library of Underwater Sounds (GLUBS) is an exciting new project being developed to create a library of underwater soundscapes. According to Audrey Looby, one of the co-authors, the project has the potential to transform what we know about our underwater world and has profound implications for conservation, restoration and our understanding of our fellow water-dwelling animal kin.

Read More


The Guardian | Listen to a Toadfish Grunt! AI Helps Decode a ‘Symphony’ of Ocean Sounds

In a major breakthrough, scientists are using algorithms to identify the clicks, calls and bleeps of marine life, as part of a 10-year project mapping noise under the sea.

Listen Here


Living Systems Leadership Retreat for Women

The call of our time is for women to step forward to lead in new ways, embodying approaches that are adaptive, resilient, collaborative, and networked – practices that the natural world has masterfully evolved over nearly 4 billion years. With nature as your teacher, Biomimicry for Social Innovation is inviting women to explore the mountains, grasslands, and organisms of northern New Mexico, learning skills to connect with nature and translate strategies from the natural world into transformative leadership practices. This retreat is for people of all ages and backgrounds who identify as female or as non-binary, including a wide realm of gender expression. Registration closes June 15th.

Learn More

Marine Mammal Conservation & How Activists Saved the Dolphins

The extreme ill effects of human activity in the ocean have been documented for decades. From irresponsible fishing techniques and oil spills to plastic pollution and global warming, the havoc humanity has brought to marine life has threatened entire species. How can we turn the tide and begin to protect what we have previously harmed? 

Dave Phillips is a Co-Founder of the Earth Island Institute and Director of its International Marine Mammal Project. The International Marine Mammal Project has been a global leader in protecting whales, dolphins, and their ocean habitats. Dave has represented marine mammal conservation issues at international conventions, including the International Whaling Commission, and has testified before Congress. The U.N.’s Environment Programme granted him its Leadership Award in honor of his efforts to protect dolphins from indiscriminate fishing techniques. In 2009, he helped open the David Brower Center, a LEED Platinum-rated green building that serves as a hub for the environmental movement.

Here, Dave discusses the ways in which he’s seen and participated in marine conservation initiatives that have saved the lives of millions of animals, and he addresses the work that still must be done.

The following is an edited and excerpted transcript from a Bioneers 2023 panel conversation.


Dave Phillips

This is a bad time to be an ocean campaigner. There are so many threats piling up, and they have such incredible impacts on marine mammals. It’s a lot of bad news. So I’m going to try something different.

Stories about successes can help change public attitude, and they’re a big part of what we do. So I’m going to tell you a story.

A big secret was happening out in the ocean. The secret was that tuna fleets found that they could chase and set nets on dolphins as a way to catch massive amounts of tuna that swim beneath the dolphin populations. It was happening way far out at sea, and it was killing an unbelievable number of dolphins. It actually turned out to be the worst killing of marine mammals in world history – seven million dolphins were killed from the time that that technique was first identified in 1959 up until the time that we got involved with it in the ‘80s. 

We had to figure out how we could do something about this. We knew that it was happening, but we didn’t know much about it. It had been a big secret of the industry. 

We had the good fortune of having a volunteer with us who had been an observer on fishing vessels. He got tired of all the things that we were trying — the scientific reports and the testimony to Congress and all this other stuff that wasn’t working. He said, “I’m going to go out  on a boat, and I’m going to capture footage, because that’s what we need to actually turn this situation around.” His name was Sam LaBudde. 

I said to Sam, “You’ve got to be out of your mind. You’re never going to get onto a boat, and if you did, you’d be lucky if you got back.” 

He said, “I’m going.” And off he went.

He drove down to Mexico and called me up. He said, “Hey, I just got a job as a cook on a Panamanian tuna crew, and we’re leaving tomorrow morning. I’ve got a video camera, and I’m going.”

Dolphins get caught and killed in nets used for tuna fishing.

Sam went out on the vessel, and he was gone for about six weeks. When he came back, he called me and told me he had captured incredible footage. He sent it to me.

It was all there. Everything – dolphins being caught under the nets, trying to rise to the surface and breathe but unable,  being ripped up and drawn through the power blocks of the vessels. 

We said, “Sam, get back here. We’ve got to get this out.” And we did. And the world changed.

All of a sudden, the press went crazy. The tuna companies were on the defensive. Members of Congress wanted to see the footage. It opened up this avenue. 

Over the next 12 months, we reached a deal with Tony O’Reilly, who owned HJ Heinz, the parent company (at the time) of the largest tuna company in the world: StarKist. He said they were done; getting out of it. Their vessels would no longer use this technique. And we made an announcement in Washington, DC. The agreement that they made was codified into law in the United States. All the other tuna companies started dropping, just falling like dominoes. Today, there are over 800 tuna companies, processors, and retailers around the world that have adopted the dolphin-safe standard. They’re no longer buying and selling any tuna that’s caught by chasing and netting dolphins. 

The dolphin mortality, which at that time was over 100,000 per year, has now dropped by 98%.  It changed their world, and it showed people, the consumers, the people that had risen up from this, that they could really make a difference. 

It was a wild ride, and it changed history. 

Those types of campaigns have a way of energizing people. They have a way of forcing change. They have a way of telling the secrets that we can’t see. Telling stories really makes a difference. So that’s the story of how we ended the largest killing of dolphins in world history. 

Marine Conservation Today

Overfishing and other human activities that threaten our marine life, including marine mammals, are so pernicious. Over 80% of our world fisheries are already fully exploited, over exploited, or in a state of collapse. Three-quarters of shark and ray species are threatened with extinction under the red list of the Union for Conservation of Nature. 

Overfishing is completely out of control. How did it get that way? It started with the boats. There’s so much more capacity and so many more vessels. They’re so much bigger. They stay out longer. They have such powerful engines now. They can drag nets that are miles long. There’s no way that the fish can sustain throughout the techniques that are being used in the fishing industry. It’s causing huge disruption and collapses. 

When we think of overfishing, we tend to think of just the fish species. But these fisheries are also having huge impacts on marine mammals and turtles because of the bycatch issue. They’re causing such great amounts of bycatch that it’s threatening other species.

Ocean warming is a terribly difficult intractable problem. Warmer waters are disrupting ocean currents and jeopardizing food availability for many species. Orcas in the Pacific Northwest are right on the edge of extinction due to a variety of issues, but not the least of which is food availability. Their food has been depleted by the overfishing of salmon, by the dams in the rivers, and by the warming of the oceans. We’re seeing a lot of that type of cascading effect.

There’s big talk about how the world is shifting to alternative fuels, but the oil and gas industry is actually growing dramatically. And you don’t have to look far to see its impacts, not only from a global warming perspective, but also from the direct action of oil spills. Look at the number of birds, the number of sea turtles, the number of marine mammals that were killed because of BP Horizon. We need to have a global phasedown and phaseout of all oil and gas ocean drilling. It needs to stop. It’s going to be difficult because of the power of big oil, but it has to happen.

By 2050, there could be more plastic in the ocean by weight than fish.

The scourge of ocean plastic is just unbelievable right now. At current rates of rising ocean plastic pollution, by 2050, there could be more plastic in the ocean by weight than fish. The global plastic industry is on a trajectory to triple by 2060. And it’s all fossil fuel. It’s all big oil. Big plastic is big oil. More and more animals are being found entangled in nets. There are humpback whales that drag nets all the way from Alaska to Hawaii, and they’re arriving in Hawaii covered in plastic nets. It’s become the single worst threat to the survival of whales, dolphins, seals, and sea lions. Every year, an estimated 300,000 dolphins, porpoises, and whales are killed by entanglement in plastic fishing gear.

I didn’t tell you my story of stopping commercial whaling. But we saved the whales. We stopped most of the commercial whaling, only to have those threats replaced by pernicious plastic pollution.

In the last few months, a sperm whale washed up on the shores of Kaua. When they did the necropsy, its stomach contained three types of fishing nets, plastic bags, seven hagfish, fish traps, plastic buoys, fishing line. It starved because its intestines were blocked from being able to process food.

There’s a lot of news now about the High Seas Treaty. It just was adopted and negotiated on March 6th of this year. It’s a big deal, and I think it’s a really good thing. It focuses on the waters that are outside the 200-mile zones, outside the areas that are controlled by jurisdictions, by countries. This part of the ocean is largely a free-for-all. There’s very little regulation. This treaty is aimed at that, with a goal of having it be part of the 30% of the ocean that is protected. It’s a good start. It’s going to be difficult to get it enacted. It has to be enacted by 60 countries.

There are lots of things people can do. There’s legislation. There’s are things you can do as consumers. If you’re going to eat fish, find fish that are not endangered or overfished. 

Learn more from Earth Island Institute.

Unlocking the Cultural Secrets of Sperm Whales

Whale researcher Shane Gero has spent years studying sperm whales in an effort to better understand their daily lives, methods of communication, and cultures. He’s discovered how fundamentally similar their lives are to our own and how closely their relationships are tied to their identities. 

In the following piece, Shane explores the influence of culture in shaping individuals and societies, highlighting the role of language and cultural norms in both human and animal interactions. He advocates for a shift in wildlife conservation, urging humans to include cultural diversity as an essential component of biodiversity and to learn from the whales’ powerful sense of community.

Following is an edited transcript of a presentation that took place at Bioneers 2023.


Twenty-four years before I was even born, in 1956, as the sun was setting, a man stood in uniform at the border between the countries of Hungary and Austria. The iconography on his shirt and his arm told you of his national allegiances, his rank, his position in life, literally the dividing line between some on one side, and others on the other. 

This night, one commonality between people who lived on both sides of the line was cigarettes. For him, this cigarette was no big deal. It was just another break from his job, another butt on the floor of the guardhouse. But for me, this cigarette would secure the safe passage of a woman. This cigarette would change my native language, the color of my passport, and my identity. 

This woman is my grandmother. She grew up in a small town in Hungary, and like many others at the time, emigrated to Canada. I only knew her as “Granny,” but in a life lived before my own, she was a pioneer of women in science working toward her Ph.D. in biochemistry.

So much of who I am came from my Grann. Little things, like cutting the butter straight, not scooping it off the top. But also very foundational parts of who I am, like how important family is, and to not forget where you come from. Other than one trip where I spent a little bit of time visiting distant family in Hungary, I still feel like Hungary is somehow a part of who I am, because who you learn from in your life defines so much of who you’ll become and what you do. We’re all human, but culture is how we learn to be one. 

Human cultures have played a huge part in deciding where people live and how they behave across civilization. As early humans evolved, language served as a cheat sheet for doing things the same way as one another. Even today, you’re far more likely to help someone who yells for help in your native language than in any other. Culture can be a unifying force but also a very divisive one, and it’s structured all of human civilization.

We know that humans aren’t the only cultural animal out there. Animal culture pervades all facets of their lives. In an amazing study in chimpanzee communities across Africa, primatologists documented the different ways that chimpanzees have figured out how to live. Because of the destruction of their habitat, mostly caused by humans, chimpanzee communities are very isolated.

In the world’s oceans, there iss a nomad that lives in this boundless blue. In that giant area, they are succeeding together at building multicultural societies. Sperm whales have been sperm whales for longer than humans have even been walking upright, so their stories are deeper than our stories. Stories like the one about a mother, who we call Can Opener, swimming through a deep, dark, and often dangerous ocean, working with her community to raise and defend their calves, like her tiny little one named Hope. 

Since 2005, I’ve had the immense privilege of spending thousands of hours in the company of Hope and Can Opener’s family, and now about 30 to 40 other families off the Caribbean island called Dominica. It’s one of the first times that anyone’s come to know these biblical Leviathans as individuals, as brothers and sisters, or as mothers and daughters.

When I think about spending half of my life learning from and listening to someone who is fundamentally different from me, I’ve taken away a lot of universal lessons.

One of the novel things that we were able to do with so much time in the company of whale families is follow the lives of the young males as they grow up and leave their families. If you’re a male sperm whale, the first 15 years of your life is spent in a hyper social community of families where you’re born. When you’re a teenager, you sound like your mom, you behave like your mom. Then all of a sudden, you start this incredible voyage around the world to live a mostly solitary life until you grow to be the size of about two school buses, and really become Moby Dick.

There’s a big shift, which isn’t so unlike our late teenage years, where you leave behind your family and go out on your own. But for the families that stay in Dominica, they learn from generations of strong female leaders – grandmothers, mothers, and daughters, who live together for life. They’ve learned the fundamental truth that both they and we know, which is that family is critical to our survival. 

When Fingers, an elder in Hope’s family, makes a deep dive, she’s diving so long that she’s holding her breath for over an hour, and she’s going three times deeper than modern nuclear attack submarines. Her unique nose houses the most powerful natural sonar system, and it means that she can explore parts of the oceans that we find difficult to even get to, which makes sperm whales a critically important part of the oceanic ecosystem.

When they talk to each other, they talk in distinct patterned sequences of clicks with stereotyped rhythms and tempos, called codas. The norm for conversation is to overlap one another and to match each other’s calls. It sounds very exciting, and it has an elegant complexity to what, at least initially, seemed like a very simple system of clicks and pauses.

I’ve recently launched a much larger project working with international researchers, called Project CETI. Our mission is to try and decode what sperm whales are saying, to answer that fundamental question of “What is so important to whales that they need to talk about it?”

What we’ve learned from our work in Dominica and around the globe is that whales mark these cultural differences with different dialects and sets of codas. All families that speak the same dialect are part of a clan. Hope and Can Opener’s clan is the Eastern Caribbean clan, and they all learn a very special coda called the 1+1+3. 

This call is unique to them. It’s only ever been recorded in the Caribbean. Calves take about two years to learn to make it right, and they really need to, because when two families meet at sea, they need to make a decision about whether or not they’re going to spend time together and collaborate. As it turns out, if they speak the same dialect, they’ll spend time together, and if they don’t, they won’t. Because behavior is what you do, but culture is how you’ve learned to do it.

Sperm whales are all sperm whales across the globe, but how they’ve learned to live their lives is very different. In the same way that some of us use chopsticks and some of us use forks, the sperm whales differ in what they eat and how they eat, where they roam, how fast they move around, their habitat preferences, their social behavior, and probably myriad ways that we don’t even understand yet. These cultures are fundamental to their identities. 

Sperm whales use acoustic markers to label where they belong, which makes sperm whale clans the largest culturally defined cooperative groups outside of humanity. 

Right now, I’m running a large project with international researchers from around the world, across three different oceans, in which we’re mapping the boundaries of these sperm whale clans. Whales have been traditionally managed based on arbitrary lines that were defined by the whalers that were killing them. More recently, through international conservation policy, they are based on broad genetic patterns that are mostly driven by the solitary males that swim from one ocean to another, from one clan to the other, moving the genes around. However, the genetic patterns can’t capture the diversity of a whale’s life in the same way that we can’t imagine that what’s encoded in human genetics can teach us everything that it is to be a human.

This is why we need to focus our conservation on the patterns of cultural diversity that we see in these female-led clans that they’re self-identifying into. We need to ignore the systems that we’ve used before and shift to a new system. This is what the global Coda Dialect Project was about: to drive home that there’s a new scientific understanding that can serve as a foundation to totally restructure international conservation policy.

We’re going to do things differently because we listen to and learn from those to whom it matters most. And we need to do that now, because sadly, we’ve been killing whales for hundreds of years, and we do so now mostly out of ignorance rather than intent. We hit them with our ships from the ever-growing shipping fleet that brings us the economy from around the world. We entangle them in our omnipresent leftover fishing gear, like Digit, who’s in Hope’s family.

Every calf counts. When you have small families that desperately need females to perpetuate themselves, if they don’t survive, you lose the family. When we lose a family, we lose generations of traditional knowledge of how to succeed as a Caribbean whale. And that can’t be replaced, even if the global population could swim into the Caribbean again, because these would be different whales from elsewhere who do things differently, who’ve learned from different grandmothers and are missing the solutions for how to succeed there.

These cultures aren’t just animals who’ve learned to do things differently because they never meet. These are really the link between the ocean that they live in and the animals that live there. It’s a bond between where and who. 

That’s why we can’t just do wildlife conservation based on total numbers or genetic stocks. We need to have the definition of biodiversity include cultural diversity. These secrets are the secrets that are allowing these species to survive. They’re the viable solutions to species survival, and we need to model our framework for conservation around that.

In the era of a climate crisis, in the shadow of a global pandemic, on a day where millions of humans are facing imminent threat from war, it’s totally academic to talk about animal communication and whale culture — but it’s a bigger message than that. If you can take one message from the culture of whales, it’s the power of community — that in the face of these unimaginable obstacles, the solution is to come together.

Painting for Peace, Interview with Laurie Marshall, Singing Tree Project Founder

Artist, Author, Educator Laurie Marshall
Interviewed by Bioneers’ Polina Smith

Laurie Marshall, an author and artist, founder of the Unity Through Creativity Foundation and the Singing Tree Project, is a certified K-12 Art and Social Studies teacher. She has worked for four decades to empower youth and adults through creative collaboration in her Peace Building through Art Inspired by Nature programs. An Arts Integration and Project-Based Learning specialist, she joins in creativity, a love of learning and a collaborative spirit with youth, adults and elders. Making use of visual art and storytelling, she has developed a wide range of consensus building, leadership training and conflict prevention initiatives with clients that have included NASA, FEMA, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Interior, the U.S. Botanical Gardens, as well as public schools, hospitals and prisons around the United States.

Polina Smith (PS): Laurie, how did you initially get involved in art, activism and teaching?

Laurie Marshall (LM): I grew up in Pennsylvania, and I got involved in peace activism very young. My parents, though my mother was raised Lutheran and my father a secular Jew, had become Quakers after they met during WWII. They resonated with the non-hierarchical Quaker belief that everyone has a divine light within them, with the silent meetings to listen for guidance from the Creator, and with the emphasis on good deeds in the world.

At nine years-old in 1958, I went to a Quaker conference in Cape May, New Jersey, with my family. Inside a long narrow hall, I felt the resonance of an electric voice that filled the crowded, creaky building. Waves of the Atlantic Ocean crashed below us. I couldn’t see the man who was speaking. I only saw the belt buckles and bellies of the grown-ups around me, but I experienced a contagious excitement. The man’s voice was a deep song. I remember his words, “People of all colors will live together like sisters and brothers.” The man was Martin Luther King, Jr. My soul was imprinted with this message. And at age 11 I dreamed I was sitting between Nikita Khrushchev and President Kennedy negotiating an end to nuclear war. I wanted there to be peace.

My path as an artist also began around that time, at the age of ten, but it got nipped in the bud. I wanted to draw trees. My family went on camping trips every summer, where we are all together—a rare treat with my father’s long work hours and my out-of-reach sisters in higher grades at school. I felt happy and excited on these adventures close to the Earth, the stars, and the mountains. On these camping trips and our suburban streets, trees captured my imagination. I found their smells, textures, changes, variety, blossoming, fruiting, falling, rooting and reaching endlessly fascinating, and trees house birds, which I also love. To express my love for trees, I set out to draw leaf after leaf after leaf. I tried to draw each leaf, but I was overwhelmed, daunted, and frustrated. After months of failure, I gave up—not only drawing trees but drawing altogether. My confidence was dashed. No one told me I could draw the big simple shape of the tree. Getting lost in the details had prevented me from seeing the whole. I stopped making any effort to capture what I saw and express what I loved.

But my path as an artist got resuscitated when I was 23 after a heartbreaking divorce. I was left with a gift from my failed marriage, the rediscovery of my love of drawing. As an extreme extrovert, I do not have easy access to my inner experience. During my childhood, I was often in a state of frozen numbness. But when I began to draw again, images appeared on the paper as if from an unknown source. Despair, sadness, anger, frustration, fear, terror, as well as joy, showed up. As the pictures appeared, the unconscious hold of the feelings dwindled. Drawing and painting allowed me to experience my Inner Light, giving me an endless abundance of ideas and a way to share my feelings with others.

I was also blessed to have a clear calling from a young age of wanting to be a teacher. I found pure joy in being with children and playing with them imaginatively. I majored in Education and History at the hands-on institution of Antioch College, getting certified to teach 7th-12th grade social studies. I was inspired by the work of visionary educators such as Paolo Freire, Sylvia Ashton-Warner and Jonathan Kozol. So, as art became more important to my own healing and self-awareness, it naturally evolved that I would combine those two passions of teaching and art.

I completed a self-directed Master’s Degree in Community Art, a title that did not fit into academics at the time, from Beacon College, now the Union Institute. I crafted a two-year program making art with elders, incarcerated youth, mentally-disabled teenagers and elementary school students. I also increased my artistic skills at the Art Students’ League in New York City and with local artists in Rappahannock County, VA, where I lived.

PS: Were there any among your many projects over the years that felt especially significant to you, that strongly affected your trajectory?

LM: In 1999, after I painted a 24’ x 4’ mural with all 130 students at Hillsboro Elementary School in rural Virginia, an eight-year-old girl, Meredith Miller, said, “I wish the whole world could see our painting, and then the whole world would be happy.” Then she asked, “What if the whole world made a painting together?”
Bam! My soul’s longing for peace, harmony and unity was met in this vision. What an impossible task—to invite the whole world to create together, but if all of humanity could consciously work together on a painting, it would demonstrate that we could work together to make a peaceful world.

I was excited and inspired but had no idea how to even conceive of trying to engage on such a project; then the model of individual trees joining forces to create whole forests sprung into my mind, and a structure for a series of murals began to grow in my imagination. I attended a conflict resolution conference with my father in San Sebastian, Spain, when a young teacher from Northern Ireland was puzzling about how she could bring the Catholic and Protestant children there together. I suggested making a painting of a tree, with children from both sides making leaves. The very subject that had made me give up drawing as a child became the key to my life’s work.

The universe also reinforced the importance of trees in the “how” of inviting the whole world to make a painting together. Someone handed me the Hungarian writer Kate Seredy’s book The Singing Tree. It tells the story of her father, who was a soldier in World War I: “One night, his battalion crawled all night long on their bellies to escape the enemy. Everything had been destroyed by war. When the dawn came, one tree was still alive. Birds from hundreds of miles away, who aren’t normally together, filled the tree, singing a song that had never been heard before.”

I saw the Earth as the Singing Tree of the solar system. All the things that divide us are not as important as the fact that we are unified in life on Earth, floating in space. We can choose to destroy each other and our Earth or create something beautiful that has never been seen before, like the new song of the birds in The Singing Tree. We can choose to generate unity through creativity—not through coercion, bombs, and bullets.

So, in 2002, I founded the Unity Through Creativity Foundation, a 501 C-3 non-profit that uses the arts as a peace-building tool, with the goal of transforming pain into purpose, trauma into beauty, and division into connection. I developed the visual structure of a tree on the Earth in space as a way for people to come together to let their visions and voices be known, to strengthen community and to be connected to those who believe in a world that works for all beings. Since then, 116 collaborative Singing Tree™ murals have been created by over 21,000 people from 52 countries, each one envisioning a positive future.

And since 2010 I’ve been coming to the Bioneers Conference and sharing this process with participants, often around the theme of the conferences. The Fig Singing Tree™ of the Child was the first mural I brought to Bioneers, made with youth from Palestine, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Oakland and Santa Rosa, CA (https://www.unitythroughcreativity.org/singing-tree-murals/fig-singing-tree-of-the-child). Bioneers has been a touchstone for the Singing Tree mural project throughout the years. The themes, the speakers, the fellowship, the inspiration of “all our relatives” have strengthened and informed the invitation for the whole world to make a painting together. Another especially memorable episode was when Jane Goodall came to Bioneers, and the mural that year, The Jane Goodall Singing Tree of Love, was dedicated to her.

At Bioneers last year, 33 youth and adults designed and painted The Magical Window Singing Tree during the three days of the conference. Again, using the theme of the conference was the organizing principle of the collaborative mural (For a video of that process click here.

And the most recent, 116th, mural was facilitated by certified Singing Tree Facilitator Dr. Sweta Rein at Albany Middle School, in Albany, CA. It’s called The Ka-Sky-da-Scope Singing Tree™ of Strength and Happiness, and it will be on display at Bioneers 2023.

PS: Are there any new projects or directions on the horizon that you are especially excited by?

LM: I’m now certifying Singing Tree Facilitators to take this restorative, visionary and fun practice to communities around the world – teaching peace literacy skills in the process of inviting the whole world to make a painting together. So far, ten people have been certified from England to Uganda to the U.S.

I’m particularly excited about the Kyangwali Singing Tree to Heal the Trauma of War, envisioned by 27-year-old Kanizius Nsabimana from the Congo who has lived in a refugee camp in northern Uganda since he was nine. He is partnering with Ugandan artist Emma Kavuma. With the UN predicting that over 180 million people will be refugees in the next ten years, this project honors those who have lived the experience of being displaced for decades. Please watch the video we made to help raise funds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3TAjg5l9wE

I am also currently inspired and supported by Shiloh Sophia, founder of the Red Thread Café and IMusea – a community of 10,000 women who use Intentional Creativity as a tool for healing and exploration.

PS: Could you tell us a little bit more about the role you hope your art will play in the world. Do you really think it can help build bridges between divided communities?

LM: It is my hope that the image of a tree on the Earth in space will become a widespread symbol of peace and unity, not through force, but through imagination and through modeling nature. Each Singing Tree™ builds the “Beloved Community” one mural at a time. Having a common creative goal makes use of differences and can bring splintered and conflicted communities together. The achievement of a small goal helps people have hope that larger goals are possible. One high school student said: “Seeing that a bunch of us can work together in harmony and make a mural in such a short time gives me hope that we can turn around global warming.”

PS: When things feel challenging and seemingly insurmountable, what keeps you going?

LM: When things feel challenging, I go to art, which helps me get the pain out of my body so it won’t debilitate me, and I can learn from it. When I create, I get in touch with the Creator within me. Because Creator is Abundance, I see endless ideas and unforeseen possibilities. That fights depression. Art is empowering, because I can make a decision and take action with the paper, canvas, clay, paints or pencil. There is so much I can’t control about the cruel and needless suffering of humans and of other beings on our beautiful planet, but at least I can have power over what values I express in my art. I can point a big arrow to what I think is important, like children and trees. I can write out my gratitude, grace, grief and gusto.

I try to surround myself with people whom I feel safe with and who share my heart, my passion for justice, and my belief that creativity and community are unstoppable. I am constantly nurturing my soul and heart and mind with trainings, books, classes, films, projects and people dedicated to self-reflection, engaged scholarship, creating art, developing and recording meaningful stories, being in community, and learning from those who are dedicating their lives to a world that works for all. I nurture the “forest” of relationships I have developed over seven decades. I stay close to children, because they are close to Creator. I stay close to my grandchildren.

I also go outside. I go to Nature and feel the drama that is larger than human stories. I feel the connection to the wonder of soil, trees, oxygen, birds, bugs, bacteria, animals, water. I feel the ecosystem that supports me and all life, and I experience gratitude.

PS: Are there any final words you’d like to share with young folks who may be feeling overwhelmed with the challenges they are facing?

LM: We were born for this time. We belong to the time and place where we are. I am an elder now. You are a young person. Each of us has a unique gift to give to Life, to the Village, to the challenges of our time, to each other. I am here to partner with your genius in building the world we know is possible – an ecologically sane, multi-racial, multi-cultural democracy. Creativity and Community are unstoppable.

Fight against food apartheid requires creating spaces for Black food & farming to thrive

This article is part of Dreaming Out Loud, a media series written as part of the Bioneers Young Leaders Fellowship Program. To learn more, visit bioneers.org/dreaming-out-loud.


The sun sets over the raised garden beds and the arches of tunneled greenhouses that line the 80 acres of mountainside land. An array of fruits, vegetables, herbs and medicines stem from rich soils, their roots intermingling with wriggling earthworms that aerate the soil. Sheep roam freely in luscious, green pastures.    

Twenty-four miles northeast, on the outskirts of Albany, New York, Leah Penniman cultivates Soul Fire Farm with the intention of feeding her neighbors living under food apartheid – a system of segregation that intentionally divides folks with access to a nutritious food landscape and those who have been denied that access due to discriminatory policies and practices.

“There’s nothing that has the simple elegance and the enduring joy compared with tending the soil, planting the seed, pulling out food, feeding the community,” co-director and program manager of Soul Fire Farm Leah Penniman said. “Everyone needs to eat. Gotta get in that garden and grow that food. It feels good to be part of something so solid and clear and true for me.”

Soul Fire Farm is an Afro-Indigenous-centered community farm that seeks to dismantle anti-Black racism – the dehumanization and systemic marginalization of Black people – bolster Black sovereignty and uplift Black wisdom in the food system. Penniman and her farming crew have leaned on ancestral land wisdom to reclaim Black agency in land ownership, provide fresh and free foods to the community and train the next generation of Black farmers.  

Through numerous food sovereignty programs, Soul Fire Farm brings over 50,000 folks from diverse communities together each year to share resources and ancestral traditions and practices on natural building, spiritual activism, health and environmental justice and sustainable agriculture.   

“We saw, time and again, this liberatory experience that folks had doing, in some ways, the most mundane things — mixing compost, harvesting kale, cooking, growing flowers — but there was something really profound and healing about that,” Penniman said. “I think that having that resource base then makes possible the psycho-spiritual liberation.”

Healing circles are hosted at Soul Fire Farm where Black, femme folks gather to indulge in collective healing practices.

Penniman hopes to not only heal the souls of Black folks, but also the land that has been ravaged by capitalistic exploitation and the resultant impacts of climate change. Soul Fire Farm employs Afro-Indigenous agroforestry practices that are rooted in the long-term vitality of the land and its people to regenerate the land. 

Mounding and mulching soils like the Ovambo people, churning dark earth compost like the peoples of Ghana and seeding the land with an intermingling of dozens of native crops like those found in Nigeria, Soul Fire Farm farms and raises livestock in a culturally indulgent way that nourishes people, their communities and the land that divinely supports and sustains them.

“We’ve done our best to catch up to our ancestors and implement and innovate on these practices of things like semi-permanent raised beds, perennial polycultures, heavy mulching systems, crop rotation, cover cropping and green manures, planting on terraces,” Penniman said. “So many of these practices — like composting — that our ancestors used are incredible at pulling carbon out of the atmosphere and putting it back into the soil where it belongs.”

Many of the sustainable farming practices employed in Black food spaces today are based on Black regenerative agricultural techniques that have allowed Black folks to amplify biodiversity, draw down carbon into rich soils, conserve water and replenish waterways, reduce synthetic inputs into the Earth, provide economic stability for people in their communities and shift power in the food system back to our communities.

“We didn’t take away. We didn’t destroy, but we actually contributed,” Penniman said. “There’s something so unbelievably profound about that because human beings, in many cases, are sort of a blight on the Earth, just taking and taking and taking and stripping and mining and washing away. To see evidence in the soil core, this whole layer of our contribution, of our community, [is] super poetic and beautiful.” 

Soul Fire Farm seeks to end racism in the food system and reclaim an ancestral connection to land through growing food and community.

Black farmers have always been innovators and pioneers of organic and sustainable farming and community-supported agriculture. Their methods and systems ask us to think holistically about food, beyond the fetishization of a food system as a linear supply chain. Black food spaces and Black ways of living in opulent harmony with the land expose food as a system connected through myriad intimate relationships between people and land who grow with, exchange with and nurture with one another.

According to Penniman, Black relationships with the land are crucial to our literacy in the languages of the Earth. The way in which we knew it was time to plant corn by the size of the leaves on an oak tree. The way we knew the age of a tree based on wrapping our arms around the trunk. The way we were alerted of danger by the song of birds. We knew that if we listened to the needs, wants and desires of the Earth, that mother nature would reveal to us how to nourish the land and our people.   

“We used to all know which way was north just by looking at the stars, and what the weather was going to be tomorrow based on the color of the sunset,” Penniman said. “That literacy has slipped through our fingers, and until we can relearn to read and understand the languages of the Earth, we’re missing very important instructions for which way to go. 

“The Earth is deity, the Earth is grandmother, the Earth is kin, the Earth is teacher.”

A legacy of Black food and farming

Farming and tending to land are often mistaken as slave work. And while the trauma of almost 500 years of racialized violence and being shackled on plantations is poignant and visceral, it has also severed a sacred bond between Black folks and the land that has sustained our communities for countless generations. It has pitted the land as the oppressor.

“The land was the scene of the crime. It’s been almost 500 years of attempted genocide, dispossession, child slavery, of sharecropping, forced migration, and heir property, a lot of stuff,” Penniman said. “It makes sense to have this association with land as criminal, but of course land is not criminal, if anything, land is the source of sustenance and foundation.”

Although the U.S. has an egregious history of Black labor exploitation and Black land theft, Black food spaces have a long legacy in the global and national food systems. Food production has not always been an almost exclusively white endeavor in the United States, starting from the very moment African folks were forced into the bowels of slave ships.

African women boarded the ships of the Transatlantic slave trade with nothing but prayers to the ancestors, fear of the unknown in their hearts and seeds, intricately woven into the tresses of their braids. Stolen from their ancestral lands, they found ways to maintain Black food spaces on the shores of different, foreign soils. They stashed seeds of rice, okra, cotton, black-eyed peas, herbal medicines and so much more, as a means of survival of their people and the culture of their homeland. 

“Our ancestral grandmothers had the audacious courage to take the seed that they had saved for generations and to braid it into their hair as insurance for an uncertain future,” Penniman said. “We use [this] as an inspiring story for all that we do, thinking of ourselves as carrying on the legacy of the seed, and trying to have even a fraction of the courage and foresight that they had in the face of just unimaginable terror.”

These African women weaved hopes that their grandchildren would experience the same intimate connection to the Earth that had guided them with a wisdom only obtained through a relationship with the soil and the plants it can produce.

And it was for this connection to Earth, this knowledge of being in relation to land, that was a driving force in the theft of Black folks and the violent fields that stained the plantations of the antebellum South. Millions of farmers were kidnapped from their communities across Africa and shackled in chains to build the very foundations of this country. 

“Slavers weren’t just capturing random people,” Penniman said. “They were actually targeting skilled agriculturalists because it’s cold in Europe, and they didn’t know how to farm Brazil and Cuba and the Southeast of the United States. They didn’t know how to grow rice or sugar cane, and so they stole people who did.”

Although our relationship with land had become associated with the harsh and violent conditions faced on plantations, it was in those same fields that community, relationships and experiences were being built despite the shackles of anti-Black racism. Drawing on both African musical heritage and western European sources, enslaved Africans developed a rich tradition of singing spirituals while they worked the fields. These songs would set an atmosphere of melancholy and mourning while simultaneously resisting the constraints of chattel slavery that sought to strip Black folks of love, joy and prosperity. They embodied a critique of the treatment of Black folks and envisioned a liberatory future for their people.

After emancipation and the egregiousness of chattel slavery, anti-Black violence would find new forms of erasure and oppression through flagrant and heinous laws and institutions intended on suppressing the agency of Black folks. Southerners implemented the “Black codes,” which criminalized unemployment and loitering. Black communities were systemically pushed to the margins of society through separate but equal policing that stamped the Jim Crow Era. Black folks would be packed into prisons and rented back to plantations through mass incarceration. 

Those who evaded the prison industrial complex were often trapped in endless cycles of debt and disenfranchisement through sharecropping labor. 

Through the continued suppression of Black liberation, Black folks continued to desire to be culturally reconnected to the land, to grow culturally nutritious foods and own property as a means to build wealth and uplift their communities.

“When our ancestors at the end of chattel slavery in 1865 had a meeting to plan out what their desires were for reconstruction in Virginia, they said, ‘What we need are homes and the grounds beneath them so we can plant fruit trees and tell our children, these are yours.’ This yearning for secure land tenure has been number one since the beginning.” 

Leah Penniman

In 1881, Tuskegee Institute — now known as Tuskegee University — was developed by Lewis Adams, a former slave, in an effort to assist Black folks in this pursuit of racial advancement, economic liberation and self-determination. Positioned on the grounds of a vacant plantation, Tuskegee would become a Black food space. 

The institute was headed by Booker T. Washington, who believed that agricultural education and skills would provide a foundation for Black folks to survive in racially hostile and economically oppressive spaces. Washington modeled Tuskegee and its curriculum to foster collective community development and bolster Black agency in food spaces. Students learned how to craft bricks to construct buildings, nurture livestock on the plantation’s pastures and grow foods that would nourish their bodies and those of their communities.

Washington made sure that Tuskegee employed an all-Black faculty, bringing in rich agricultural knowledge like that of agricultural scientist and inventor George Washington Carver. Carver used human connection to land and careful nurturing of the ground to provide his students an education for their very survival. 

Over the years, Tuskegee would prove itself as a vehicle through which nature and the natural bounty of the land could be better heard and tended to through innovations such as Carver’s farming methods to prevent soil depletion, promotion of alternative crops to cotton that were soil-enhancing and protein-rich and development of hundreds of products using peanuts, sweet potatoes and soybeans.

In the 1960s, Black horticulturist and Tuskegee University professor, Booker T. Whatley, introduced the concept of community-supported agriculture (CSA) as a solution for struggling Black farmers. Today, CSAs provide farmers with capital to start the growing season.

Despite the failed promise of reparations in the form of 40 acres and a mule, by 1910, 16 million acres, or about 14% of all U.S. land, was owned by Black folks. 

“Despite the broken promise of 40 acres and a mule, where reparations were actually given to the former so-called slave owners but not to enslaved emancipated people themselves, like people saved up,” Penniman said. “Our ancestors saved their own money over generations to purchase these hard-scrabble like, two-to-three acre, five-acre lots in less desirable condition.”

This land was developed into Black food spaces — into farms that established Black agency in the American food system.

“I think when we have that direct contact in a safe and consensual way, there’s an opportunity for the earth to compost that trauma and give us back belonging,” Penniman said. “We’ve seen it so many times over and over again. I can’t imagine that anything else is happening there except that reunion that the earth is longing for.”

However, anti-Black racism ran deep regarding Black land ownership. Murder and lynchings by white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and the white caps ravaged Black communities, killing over 4,000 Black landowners and destroying their farms and properties. 

Nationally, Black farmers have lost more than 12 million acres of farmland over the past century, according to a report from the Washington Post. A massive loss that is the product of biased government policies and discriminatory business practices.

Today, 95% of agricultural land in the U.S. is white-owned.

The shift in land ownership went beyond the fear and anger of white planters, as several factors have contributed to the decline of Black-owned farms. 

“We’ve seen time and again, the delays, the denial, the betrayals by the government,” Penniman said. “USDA programs, for example, have been a leading culprit in Black land loss because of delays and denial of lending, and also foreclosure on land that was used to collateralize loans that were given. So there’s a very sensical distrust of USDA programs which have failed us.”

U.S. federal programs utilized discriminatory policies to exlcude Black folks from land purchases and limited access to capital through the denial of farm loans, crop insurance and allotments. No legal protections existed to facilitate transfer of property to the next generation. Black farmers were routinely discouraged from registering to vote and joining the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), otherwise running the risk of their grant and subsidy application being destroyed or denied. 

The long-documented racial discrimination of this USDA policing ultimately led to the largest civil rights class action lawsuit in U.S. history — the Pigford case of 1999. 

During the same time, a new Black food space was taking root in community and emerging through the gaps of the American food system. In 1966, Huey Newton and Bobby Seale established the Black Panther Party for Self Defense to address and decry police oppression of Black folks and the violence imposed on their community in Oakland, California. 

“We’re in many ways inspired by the work of the Black Panther Party, who had an unapologetic political platform but really saw the foundation of their work in their survival programs — that they’d be completely irrelevant if not addressing some of these foundational basic needs around medical care, transportation, food,” Penniman said.

Three years after its conception, the party began to build community self-determination by addressing the needs of their community around medical care, transportation and food. The Panters’ first and most successful community program was the Free Breakfast for Children Program. 

By 1968, most poor children attended school hungry, suppressing the pangs of hunger throughout the day. The national school lunch program offered reduced-price, but not free lunches for children living in poverty. Furthermore, the national school breakfast program was a limited program that hadn’t fully taken hold in most schools. 

The Breakfast Program quickly spread throughout the country and was hosted in 36 cities by 1971. The Panthers had fed more than 20,000 children by the end of the program’s first year. In a 1969 U.S. Senate hearing, it would be admitted that the Panthers fed more poor school children than did the State of California. 

The Black Panther Party focused national attention on several issues faced by the Black community, including the urgent need to provide poor children meals while they attend school. Their program put a spotlight on the limited scope of federal food programs and ultimately applied the pressure needed for Congress to authorize the expansion of what is now our modern-day food programs in public schools. 

“It should be around every turn that there are these liberated spaces where folks can have access to food, clean air, clean water, the dancing, the drumming, the ceremony, the natural resources that allow us to experience and tap into that feeling of freedom and liberation, which really is a birthright for all people.”

Leah Penniman

A history of food injustice in Black communities

The racialized violence that has continuously devastated Black communities is egregious and spurred by anti-Black racism and white fear of Black liberation. Anti-Black racism and land injustice have been profoundly dangerous in the ways they show up through our nation’s exploitative food system. It is anti-Black racism that has continuously disenfranchised Black communities from their relationships with the land and with food. 

In 1920, more than 925,000 Black farmers in the U.S. comprised about 14% of the farmer population. Today, fewer than 49,000 — slightly more than 1% — of farmers in the U.S. are Black. 

“There are trillions of dollars owed, there are many acres of land owed,” Penniman said. “These need to be given back.”

But farms today are overwhelmingly owned by white people, while approximately 85%  are tended to by people of color. Most of these farm workers aren’t provided adequate protections by basic labor laws, leaving them without paid time off, overtime pay or collective bargaining. 

“When folks come to this country to work, their life expectancy drops by over 10 years from what it would be in their counterparts,” Penniman said. “It’s an incredibly dangerous, deadly occupation — heat stroke, COVID exposure, sexual assault. The foundation of this country was to kidnap millions of our ancestors and bring them in the bowels of slave ships to be skilled, unpaid, forced laborers on the land. So we have not been able to divest ourselves from this idea that agriculture needs to rely on the exploitation of human beings and the exploitation of the land.”

This exploitation of Black farmers and the dispossession of Black land has resulted in a lack of access to healthy, affordable and culturally nutritious foods. The experiences of many Black communities today include food apartheid. 

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 1 in 10 households in the U.S. is food insecure, lacking close access to foods that are culturally relevant and that meet their dietary needs. Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults experience food insecurity rates of 29.2% and 32.3%, respectively. In contrast, 17.3% of white adults experience food insecurity. 

The USDA uses the term “food desert” to describe the geographically linked disparities in food access, defining the phenomenon as a low-income census tract where a substantial portion of residents has minimal access to a grocery store or supermarket. 

Although about 23.5 million people live in food deserts — nearly half of which are poverty-afflicted and have a greater concentration of Black folks — this framework fails to address the dominant food system as a product of intentional policy decisions, such as redlining, that are the root causes of inadequate healthy and affordable food. 

Karen Washington has spent decades amplifying urban farming as a way to increase access to healthy, locally-grown food.

“You’re just using an outsider’s term of people who’ve never been in our neighborhood, and you’re not talking about the critical things we need to talk about around food,” said Karen Washington, Black food advocate and co-owner of Rise & Root Farm. “How it impacts people of color, where they live, how much money they have.”

Making these practices invisible prevents us from having conversations about food system agency and from mobilizing transformative solutions beyond attracting more grocery stores.

Although common, living in an area with minimal access to nourishing food does not necessarily mean that a person is food insecure. In fact, these areas are often flooded with food choices—just not ones that are healthy, affordable and culturally meaningful.

Without easy access to nourishing food, people — largely low-income and Black folks — are forced to turn to more convenient and affordable options, namely fast food. 

A study by the University of Connecticut’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity found that these barred communities are likely to have four unhealthy eating options for every one healthy option. These areas also suffer from higher rates of diet-related diseases, such as Type 2 diabetes and heart disease, which are the leading cause of death and disability today.

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Minority Health, Black people are 30% more likely to die from heart disease than whites, and twice as likely to die from diabetes.

“You’re told to eat healthy food but yet you don’t have healthy food options,” Washington said. “Then when you’re asked to eat healthy food, it’s expensive.”

These health inequities are the result of barred access that prevents Black folks from fully participating in the food landscape and a barbaric history of unjust policies and practices that have left neighborhoods without access to affordable homes, good jobs, well-funded schools and un-policed streets.

To fully understand access to culturally nutritious foods, we must look at all systems that create inequitable facets of society. Most people who experience food apartheid live in low-income communities. The reality is, food security is a social justice issue built on the foundation of the suppression of Black prosperity and leaves many communities engulfed by hunger and poverty.

Most of these poverty-afflicted areas are a product of disinvestment and unjust federal programs that led to segregation, not only in geography but also in economics. 

In the 1930s, while federal intervention and community investment helped expand homeownership and affordable housing for countless white families, it also segregated the country and undermined wealth-building in Black communities. This state-sponsored system of segregation — this institutionalized anti-Black racism — pushed Black folks out of the new suburban homes and instead into urban housing projects and areas of immense disinvestment.

Redlining – segregating communities through racially discriminatory real estate tactics – was used as a tool to deny Black folks mortgage insurance, mortgage refinancing and federal underwriting opportunities. Entire Black communities were classified as financially risky and a threat to local property values.

This process of redlining not only barred Black folks from home ownership, but it forced communities into economic decline and the perils of community disinvestment. What is left today is millions of Black communities that lack access to basic resources like healthcare, banking, job opportunities, public transportation and culturally nutritious foods to put on the table. 

Rise & Root Farm is a five-acre farm in New York, and is run cooperatively by four owners who are women, intergenerational, multi-racial and LGBTQIA+.

“If you are hungry, your body, there is this instinct of survival. And so you would let go of the rent so that you can buy food,” Washington said. “And yet you need the rent because you need shelter. And so you can’t talk about one without the other. So you’re asking people to eat healthy, but if they don’t have a roof over their head, if they don’t have living-wage jobs, all of those impact the ability of people to purchase ‘healthy’ food.”

At its core, the term “food apartheid” is a way for us to visualize the manifestations of structural oppression and systemic, anti-Black racism that are inextricably linked to the food system. This framework puts clearly into focus the deliberate violence, policy choices and chronic community disinvestment that have resulted in racial inequities in access to healthy and affordable food. 

“I’m trying to use a term that strips away that sort of artificial, sanitized word and starts getting people to say, ‘Wait a second, we need to look closer at this food system that’s racially charged, that really has impacted so many people of color,’” Washington said. 

Furthermore, “food apartheid” identifies white supremacy as the foundational catalyst in the policymaking process and calls attention to the aftermath of decades of systemic racism that led to the erasure of community sovereignty by means of segregation and the deniability of social and economic mobility. 

“When people say the food system is broken and needs to be fixed, and I say no, no, no, it’s doing exactly what it’s supposed to be doing,” Washington said. “It is a shift, and that needs to be the power in the hands of the community. The communities have to come together and start to understand and own their power.”

Washington believes that change is going to come — that Black and brown communities will once again find themselves in the position to feed their communities, be self-sufficient and self-reliant and to take care of our own.

“You cannot continue to put people down, that they have no food to eat, no clothes on their back, no roof over their head. You cannot continue to do that because the masses are going to come together, and they are going to uprise.”

Karen Washington

For Black farmers across the country, an uprising has already begun. Black folks are again turning to their ancestral farming practices to reclaim and mobilize Black food spaces — settings and experiences created in Black solidarity and in opposition to the dominant food system — in an effort to uproot food apartheid in their communities. 

Black food is an act of resistance

A ray of sunlight cascades over the raised beds of Black Joy Farm. Its light intimately weaves through rows of broccoli, eggplants, tomatoes and corn — its warmth gently embracing every fruit and vegetable it touches. Its shimmer illuminates the rich reds, greens, purples and yellows of the plants that find root in the dark soil humus. 

The sweet and sour aroma of a red bell pepper envelopes the crisp morning air. The cluck of hens erases any other noise throughout the 5400 square foot, urban farm. 

Justin Mashia co-founded Bronx Sole, a running group, to address poor health in his neighborhood.

“You can be in that space and not even know you’re in the city, especially when you’re around the chickens and they’re making so much noise,” said Justin Mashia, manager of Black Joy Farm. “They kind of drown out all of the city noise. It’s a beautiful thing.” 

Nestled behind a shopping center in the Longwood neighborhood in the Bronx, Mashia works with others at the Black Feminist Project to tend the land, sow the seeds and reap the crops of Black Joy Farm. Much of the fresh produce, herbs, eggs and other foods grown at the farm are provided to families across the Bronx at low to no cost. Over the seven years that Black Joy Farm has been in operation, hundreds of pounds of fresh food has been given away to Black and brown folks residing in the poorest congressional district in the nation.

“I can’t help everyone at the same time, but we can do our part,” Mashia said. “Just imagine if we had more of these spaces and how we could truly feed the community. We need the access to the land, because if we have access to land, we have access to food, and access to food is how we can build, in ways, wealth in our communities.” 

The effects of food apartheid are felt throughout the borough. Despite a rich history of community organizing and advocacy, large disparities continue to bar communities from equitable access to food. Although it houses the world’s largest food distribution center, The Bronx has ranked last in all of New York State’s 62 counties in health outcomes since 2009. 

“Food justice is so important because we’re disconnected,” Mashia said. “Being Black in America, all we know is fast food. We know fast foods, but most of us don’t know growing food.”

Black food spaces such as Black Joy Farm provide nourishment to communities who have continually been involuntarily deemed undeserving of foods that holistically tend to and nurture our entire being — foods that connect us to community and root us in the Earth. Black folks need, deserve and are owed spaces in which we can relish in our ancestral ways of knowing and tending to the land and surround ourselves with the beauty of fresh, ripe foods to eat. 

Black food spaces have the power to liberate us from hunger and the power to heal our minds and souls as we work to reclaim the very intimate parts of ourselves that have consistently and violently been stolen from us. When we are able to regain our divine connection to the land, we are also able to find sanctuary from the abuses of anti-Black racism and patterns of white dominance.

Students get to plant greens of their own during the summer youth programs at Black Joy Farm.

“Sometimes I have a blanket and just lay out there, just put my hands out and just lay and look at the sky, and just watch the clouds go by,” Mashia said. “It’s a healing space more than just a community farm. It’s an oasis from the harsh and crazy city life that we live.”

In a society where the police conceive of themselves as soldiers at war with communities, where politicians blatantly craft oppressive and dehumanizing policies and where Black folks are still hunted for the fear of their liberation — fear of their very existence — spaces must exist for Black folks to catch a breath. It is for our survival that we carve our spaces for ourselves where we may find rest, peace and a reprieve from the violence and oppression of anti-Black racism.

“Our space is a safe space for anyone in the community,” Mashia said. “You don’t have to come in there to grow something or want to learn about anything agriculturally. You can just come in there. Some women just come in there and they just want to sit in the space and read a book.”

According to Mashia, it can be easy to forget that the kids that attend the Black Joy Farm summer programs are dealing with so much more than the food injustice that plagues the Bronx. While Black Joy Farm relishes in the beautiful depths of Blackness, the environment outside is harsh. 

“They’re dealing with domestic issues, drugs and alcohol, and all these crazy things — gangs and things like that,” Mashia said. “Being able to come here, they’re using the space to release and feel like they can be themselves and let their guard down, and they’re in a happy environment.”

Black farmers like Mashia are returning to their agricultural roots with the intention of feeding and healing their people who have always been systemically denied access to healthy, affordable and culturally meaningful food and spaces to exist unencumbered by the white gaze.

“That’s what we’re always fighting for: access to these spaces,” Mashia said. “If we had these spaces, just imagine what we could do.”