A Primal Scream: Taking Action Against an Illegitimate Regime

As a boy, he threw rocks at babies. He’s doing it again.

After the other parents all finally barred the boy from playing with their kids, Daddy Trump, the abuser-in-chief, shipped Donald the Menace off to military boarding school. He never went home again.

Tony Schwartz, who actually wrote The Art of the Deal because Trump had such extreme ADHD that he literally could not focus for more than 3-4 minutes, has said flatly: “He’s mentally ill. Inside the man is a black hole.”

Now from the mighty White House, he’s jailing babies and savaging desperate families, the casualties washing back on the shores of the American policy and corporate globalization that have driven them here. And make no mistake: These are already the first waves of climate refugees in many cases, and it’s going to get a whole lot worse as the people of the South flee the mayhem that the North’s fossil economy has caused.

I don’t know how to put a primal scream into words. This is not a policy – it’s a psychosis. No, I really don’t think the Founding Fathers envisioned a psychopath in the White House illegitimately elected through election meddling by a hostile foreign authoritarian regime and partisan exploitation of an archaic system rotting from the inside out.

In 2017 Noam Chomsky floated a hypothesis: The Republican Party is the most dangerous organization in human history. Check. We also know Putin’s a Republican and the Russian hackathon of the upcoming election is the Republicans’ best shot of holding on to power and perhaps avoiding impeachment, disgrace and lengthy jail terms.

This is the moment of truth in this Age of Disinformation. All people of good will and good heart need to break through the political pavement and grow a new politics. We need to do a lot more than change elected officials, although that will help at this fateful time when holding the center is a life-and-death issue for countless people. We also need to change the system, and we need a change of heart.

We forget that the Nazis arose from the nation considered the most advanced and cultured in the world. It’s easy to see right now how the “good Germans” came to be. Indeed, silence is complicity, but complicity is also complicity.

Are we really going to accept an illegitimate regime that’s carrying out a coup d’etat in slow motion? Are we really going to give this gangster cartel any other name? Are we really going to let him throw enough rocks at babies to make a wall?

Please help kids and their families reunite and survive while we change these systems once and for all – yes, for all.

We asked around the Bioneers community for some of the very best people and groups working on the front lines of crisis with asylum seekers, refugees and related issues. Please help however you can.

Resources for Helping Migrant Families at the Border

We asked around the Bioneers community for some of the very best people and groups working on the front lines of crisis with asylum seekers, refugees and related issues. Please help however you can.

Attend Events

Saturday, June 30 – Families Belong Together
Scheduled Nationwide

An update from the event’s website: “A federal judge ruled against Trump’s family separation policy—but we know the administration will fight back. We have momentum and we cannot slow down now since the the court ruling along isn’t enough and could be overturned. Our mobilization, in over 600 locations around the country and still growing, is critical to showing the widespread public demand for just immigration policies—because families belong together … and free!”

Support Groups Providing Direct Services

Women’s Refugee Commission

The Women’s Refugee Commission improves the lives and protects the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis.

Cara Family Detention Pro Bono Project

Represents women and children in immigration detention.

Diocesan Migrant and Refugee Services (DMRS)

The only full-service immigration legal aid clinic serving low-income immigrants and refugees residing in the southwestern United States.

Las Americas

Provides legal services to the asylum-seeking parents separated from their families. The organization needs donations as well as volunteer attorneys. For the latter, contact Linda Rivas

Annunciation House

Provides life-saving refuge and nourishment to migrants.

Detained Migrant Solidarity Committee

Helps pay immigration bonds to get detained people free, thus calling them to reunite with family, avoid bail bond lenders and improve their chances in immigration court.

Fianza Fund

The Fianza Fund works with families to assist them in coming up with the bond amount and going through the long and sometimes confusing processes for bonding someone out.

RAICES Fund

The largest immigration legal services provider in Texas. RAICES directly funds bonds to allow parents to unite with their detained children. They will ensure legal representation for every separated family and every unaccompanied child in Texas’ immigration courts and work to get these children and parents the psychological care they will need after this experience.

Videos

Echoes of the Past

Identity Erasure

Historical and Other References

A Primal Scream: Taking Action Against an Illegitimate Regime

An editorial on our current political system and government, written by Bioneers Co-Founder Kenny Ausubel.

Barbaric: America’s Cruel History of Separating Children from their Parents

The Trump administration’s policy of separating parents and children who cross the border illegally has roots in slave and Native American families being ripped apart.

Trump has turned words into weapons. And he’s winning the linguistic war

From ‘spygate’ to ‘fake news’, Trump is using language to frame – and win – debates. And the press operate like his marketing agency.

Special thanks to the Latino Community Foundation, Haas Center, Sachi Yoshii from East Bay Community Foundation who is working at the border, and Dan Skaff at Radical Impact Partners for helping us create this collection.

Why Psychedelics?

The use of psychedelics as therapeutic agents is a topic that had been garnering public interest and press coverage in recent years as more and more credible research is beginning to unveil their potential curative properties for a number of major psychological ailments. Michael Pollan’s brand new book about the subject (How to Change Your Mind: What the New Science of Psychedelics Teaches Us About Consciousness, Dying, Addiction, Depression, and Transcendence) has now propelled the subject even further into prominence. This represents a major shift as these substances were demonized and viewed as dangerous drugs with no possible redeeming features by the authorities and mainstream cultural gatekeepers for many decades until quite recently (and they are of course still mostly illegal outside of a few officially sanctioned studies.)

Bioneers has included the use of psychedelics as a topic worthy of discussion at our conference since its inception some 30 years ago. While it was just one subject among many we paid attention to, we got quite a bit of pushback from some members of our audience and outside observers. Given the severity of the environmental crisis, of social injustices and geopolitical conundrums, why include such a controversial and tangential topic, bound to alienate everyone but the most countercultural members of our potential audience?

Explore our Visionary Plant Consciousness & Psychedelics media collection >>

This is a question we pondered seriously because, while we are unapologetically “eco” and “progressive” in our overarching worldview, we have always wanted to have a big tent that welcomed a very diverse, wide range of groups, often with differing perspectives: green entrepreneurs and anti-capitalists; vegans and organic cattle-ranchers; people of faith and secular rationalists; communitarians and libertarians; etc. Why take the risk of losing credibility by delving into this contentious domain and perhaps driving away potential allies for more important causes? After serious consideration, we decided that we would not be being true to ourselves if we failed to include the subject. Here’s why:

First, while it is not often discussed, it is an undeniable fact that quite a few of the most dedicated environmental activists of our era were deeply affected by their experiences with psychoactive substances. In many cases these often urban or suburban young people’s encounters in their formative years with psychedelics in natural settings either triggered or enhanced powerful “biophilic” feelings, spiritual bonds with the natural world that set a tone for the rest of their lives, often helping shape both their political and spiritual perspectives. And, of course, though no one in the mainstream likes to acknowledge it very much, the influence of these substances on our culture’s music, literature, art, fashions, mores and even technology (the cyber revolution’s origins are awash in LSD…), while far from uniformly positive or free of silly excess, was and is powerful and long-lasting. To ignore these vision-inducing substances, whatever our ultimate view of them, is to ignore and distort our own recent history.

And it’s not just our recent history in which these substances played a noteworthy role: vision-inducing plants seem to have played significant functions in some of humanity’s greatest foundational civilizations. The mystery teachings at Eleusis in ancient Greece, among the most important spiritual institutions of that era which lasted nearly a millennium and were a rite of passage for nearly every major Greek intellectual figure, included the ingestion of a mysterious vision-inducing drink, a variant of the ancient Kykeon, a barley-based beverage, as a central sacrament (which Gordon Wasson, Albert Hoffman and others speculated may have included ergot mold, from whence sprung LSD). The equally mysterious use of a vision-inducing substance called “soma” is mentioned very frequently in the planet’s oldest spiritual texts, ancient India’s Vedas.

More immediately relevant, some of the Indigenous groups in the Americas who are most known for the depth of their botanical knowledge and the sophistication of their ecological awareness have long used sacred visionary plants as central tools in understanding their environments. We modern industrialized folks, who have failed so dramatically in finding a sustainable, harmonious balance with our environments and other species, have a great deal to learn from the practices and worldviews of these long-lived (and now often highly threatened) cultures. This doesn’t mean it’s necessarily appropriate for us to emulate their practices or adopt their beliefs, but it would certainly behoove us to forgo our long-standing cultural arrogance and to try to open our minds to their ways of seeing the world. Learning from Indigenous worldviews has been one of the core components of our approach to the environmental crisis since Bioneers was launched three decades ago.

Finally, we felt that to ignore the incredible socio-economic and personal damage and the underlying racism of the “War on Drugs” would be inexcusable, so we felt that as part of our exploration of the larger topic of the use of consciousness-modulating substances, we had to include confronting and exposing our society’s full range of responses to these substances, and to advocate for far more compassionate and open-minded approaches.

All that said, let us be crystal clear: our interest in the use of these fascinating substances is by no means an exhortation to their mass consumption. These are potent medicines that are, at best, not made for casual use by the unprepared. The widespread use of vision-inducing molecules, while nowhere as cumulatively socially harmful and costly as the use of tobacco or alcohol or hard drugs, has definitely posed real problems at times, and on occasion individuals using them without proper guidance have come to serious harm, even death in a handful of cases. Some people with certain types of underlying medical and psychiatric conditions should never take them, and even those who could benefit from them should only do them in the ideal “set and setting.” It is to be hoped the growing acceptance of their potential benefits might lead in the future to a world in which expert guidance and proper screening and preparation would be provided to those wishing to explore the inner dimensions these molecules seem to help provide access to.

It is in that spirit that we have gone through our three decades of archives of the most interesting presentations and discussions held on these topics at Bioneers and polished and re-mixed their sound and video, so that a new generation can now have access to this remarkable material, some of it totally unique and not to be found anywhere else. An impressive array of very diverse, highly accomplished experts from a wide range of backgrounds and fields, from ethno-botany to medical research to anthropology to spiritual leadership to drug reform advocacy, most of them years in advance of their time, devoted their lives with great courage and passion to exploring many aspects of these tricky plants and substances and came to Bioneers and presented their stories and wisdom over the years. We certainly don’t all need to imbibe psychedelics, but it’s at least worth it for many of us to listen to those who have tried to explore what the use of these plants and molecules might be able to contribute to lessening human suffering and perhaps even to helping a bit in awakening our own civilization from its current ecocidal trajectory.

Seed Librarians Are Fighting To Protect The U.S.’s Resilient And Diverse Food System

This blog post and all media within were re-posted with permission from Mark Schapiro. For the original article Visit: Pacific Standard

Stories arising from reporting by Mark Schapiro for his new book, SEEDS OF RESISTANCE: The Fight for our Food Supply, to be published by Skyhorse Publishing/Hotbooks in September 2018.

Break open a seed and you unravel a genetic story.

Inside every seed is a narrative told by chromosomes, a tale that reveals how the plant absorbs nutrients and responds to threats from pests and weeds and to changes in climate and weather.

Inside every seed library — and there are more than 400 of them now — is another tale. Here are seeds that have been locally cultivated, saved, and passed along from farmer to farmer. They are repositories of genetic information that have been quietly spreading across America during the last decade. They tell the story of how, at a time of unprecedented climatic stress on our food supply, people are fighting to expand their range of crop choices to respond to changing climate conditions.

As one company after another is purchased by the giants that now dominate the seed trade — most notably Bayer-Monsanto, Syngenta, and DuPont-Pioneer, which together have purchased hundreds of locally based seed companies over the past 20 years — the libraries are defying efforts to homogenize the seeds.

The United States Department of Agriculture points to climate change as a significantly disruptive force on America’s capacity to grow food, and recommends a more diverse array of crops as a major step toward developing greater resilience. At the same time, numerous studies (including a major 30-year side-by-side comparison of the yields from organic versus conventional agriculture) suggest that farm fields with greater diversity are just as productive as the mono-cropped farms that rely on heavy applications of agricultural chemicals, and they come with far less collateral damage to the environment and public health.

Today, most of America’s seed is produced by multinational chemical companies with a seed division. The companies have been steadily eliminating local varieties that are genetically adapted to the specific ecosystems of American farm country — differences that are reflected in their performance in environments ranging from mountain valleys to the flat plains, wetlands to low desert. Instead, they mass-produce seeds bred to be planted over vast swaths of farmland, augmented with chemical boosters to compensate for what’s lacking from generations of local adaptation.

The variety of seed available to farmers is dwindling: 80 percent of the corn and 70 percent of the soybeans grown in the U.S., for example, come from just four companies. In 2015, a team of USDA-funded researchers from Kansas State University and North Dakota State University reported the first county-by-county assessment of crop diversity. They reviewed 34 years of USDA census data on every recorded crop species grown in every contiguous U.S. county and found that, from 1978 to 2012, there’s been a steady decline in diversity in almost every food-growing part of the country. They expressed concern that the narrower genetic base has increased vulnerability to “the highly variable weather resulting from climate change,” as well as to pests or diseases that can spread rapidly through fields of identical plants.

As the industry consolidates, seed libraries are emerging like a parallel universe, offering local varieties for farmers and gardeners to test out, replant, and evaluate for other local users. Many are hosted by public lending libraries — adding a new sort of story to the many already on the shelves. The seeds are often housed in small packets inside old-fashioned card catalogs rescued from storage bins when libraries went digital. These small-scale seed sanctuaries are at the forefront of efforts to sustain and nourish a diverse seed supply. The libraries operate according to basic farmer principles, almost nostalgic by now: Those who test the seeds out in their fields are expected to return the following season with a sampling of the results and notes on their performance that might be helpful to the next user.

The average age of American farmers is rising, and now stands at 58 years, while the number of farms is falling — from 2.2 million in 2007, according to the USDA, to 2.07 million in 2015.

While there are abundant studies about the importance of diversity to a thriving agriculture, there are few about the relatively recent role of seed libraries. One of those, in the Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences by Nurcan Helicke, an assistant professor of environmental studies and sciences at Skidmore College, suggests that the libraries and other forms of open seed-sharing enhance farmers’ knowledge of seeds’ performance in local conditions and provide a hedge against the loss of precious genetic information to a homogenizing industry.

This double-pronged approach comes at a time when the pool of experienced farmers in the U.S. is contracting: The average age of American farmers is rising, and now stands at 58 years, while the number of farms is falling — from 2.2 million in 2007, according to the USDA, to 2.07 million in 2015.

The seed libraries provide an important store of knowledge that might otherwise be lost, Helicke writes, documenting and protecting such information from disappearing. Farmers’ ability to exchange and distribute saved seeds, she concludes, helps to minimize their dependence on commercial suppliers. Seed libraries are becoming repositories for our increasingly endangered genetic resources — publicly accessible and independent from the agriculture conglomerates that are becoming ever more detached from the fields where farmers plant their crops.

Open a drawer, as I did last spring at the seed library in Richmond, California, and instead of an indexed listing of books, you may find seeds for chili peppers, chard, bok choy, kale, fava beans, and locally bred peas, each accompanied by scrawled notationsof their performance in the local conditions (for example: morning fog; often indirect sun; limited water over the last three years). “We see this as a positive response to our growing knowledge of what we need to hold onto for climate resilience,” says Rebecca Newburn, an ardent gardener, middle-school science teacher, and co-founder of the Richmond Grows Seed Lending Library, housed in a corner near the magazine racks in the Richmond Public Library. “In a world in which more than half of the seeds for major crops are controlled by three companies, we’re trying to relocalize our resources.”

Even at this small scale, asserting independence from the commercial industry has put the libraries on a collision course with the powerful regimes that govern the seed trade: On June 12th, 2014, the two clashed when the Simpson Public Library in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, received a notice from the Bureau of Plant Industry in the state Department of Agriculture. “It has come to my attention … that you plan to offer your patrons the option to participate in a Seed Library,” wrote the state’s seed control official. “My understanding is that patrons will be able to ‘check out’ seeds, take them home and plant them, harvest any resulting fruits, collect seeds, and return the collected seed to the ‘Seed Library’ for planting in the following season…. I believe there are some issues of seed distribution that you may not be aware of….” The letter then went on to list several statutes that the library could be violating, including the dissemination of unregistered and untested seeds and seeds that had not been officially assessed for their germination capacities.

Neil Thapar, a staff attorney at the center, said that the Pennsylvania threat was a wake-up call for them too. The seed libraries were indeed in a legal gray zone: They were disseminating seeds not authorized or tested by the states, which do so to protect consumers from seeds that might deliver a different plant than promised. But they were also not quite illegal, since they were not distributing patented seed varieties, which had gotten farmers in trouble in the past. A public pressure campaign convinced the newly elected Democratic governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Wolf, to change course in Mechanicsburg. Thapar and his colleagues went on to work with local groups to get laws passed in the Minnesota and Nebraska legislatures exempting the libraries from seed-registration laws, essentially affirming their legal status.

Seed libraries and seed exchanges may be the most important thing we’re doing for agriculture in the 21st century.

In February of 2016, the action came to a head when the Seed Exchange Democracy Act was introduced into the state legislature in California, which is home to roughly 60 seed libraries of varying size. This was the big battle, with national implications. It drew in the California Seed Association, the industry trade group, which made a vigorous effort to cripple the legislation and limit its power. But the association met resistance from a coalition of sustainable-farming advocates and farmers, including the California Climate and Agriculture Network and the Occidental Arts and Ecology Center, a hub of organic-farming experimentation.

After multiple hearings, and a last-minute standoff when the seed industry tried to narrow the bill’s scope by requiring that libraries state publicly that they would not share patented seeds — which librarians feared could scare off users, without protecting the libraries from legal liability — the bill was signed by Governor Jerry Brown last September. It took effect in January of 2017, and promises to provide a model for similar initiatives in other states. The act affirms the legal status of seed libraries and exchanges, and exempts them from registration and labeling rules governing the commercial seed trade.

According to Thapar, the bill not only gets farmers and gardeners off the hook for exchanging seeds, but, at its core, affirms an expanded definition of farmers’ relationship with their seeds. “We’re trying to redefine farmers using seed libraries. They’re not ‘consumers’ requiring consumer protection. They’re active and engaged participants in giving and using and testing the seeds.” In other words, they’re not just passive recipients of seeds from the seed companies, but are intertwined with the very process of nurturance and evolution that has been at the core of seed breeding since humans invented agriculture.

This shift in sensibility has become especially important in the face of disruptions in farm country caused by climate change — increasing temperatures; rain coming at unusual times, or not at all; diminishing fog; earlier springs; later winters. “The hottest topic among farmers now is how to position yourself knowing that you could have any kind of thing happening in any season — too wet, too dry, too hot, too cold, all in one season,” says Michael Sligh, a program director at the Rural Advancement Foundation International, which has been promoting seed diversity as a way to strengthen local farm economies.

Syria Holds the Secret to Our Species’ Survival

This blog post and all media within were re-posted with permission from Mark Schapiro. For the original article Visit: Mother Jones

Stories arising from reporting by Mark Schapiro for his new book, SEEDS OF RESISTANCE: The Fight for our Food Supply, to be published by Skyhorse Publishing/Hotbooks in September 2018.

is story was originally published by Food and Environment Reporting Network.

Salvatore Ceccarelli knew he was engaging in a subversive act when, in 2010, he took two 20 kilo sacks of bread and durum wheat seeds from a seed bank outside of Aleppo, Syria and brought them to Italy during a visit back to his home country. Now, seven years later, those seeds from the Fertile Crescent, the birthplace of domesticated agriculture, with thousands of years of evolution behind them, are poised to challenge the system of plant patenting in Europe, and, soon enough perhaps, the United States.

eccarelli, one of the world’s foremost seed scholars and practitioners and an honorary research fellow at Bioversity International, has consulted with governments on policies to encourage biodiversity. He has also been a leading advocate of participatory plant breeding—which, as he describes it, means engaging farmers in the process of breeding new crop varieties, rather than leaving that to the rapidly consolidating group of global seed companies.

Ceccarelli arrived in Syria in 1984 and stayed for the next quarter-century as a senior breeder and researcher at the International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), one of nine UN specialized agencies founded to protect regionally evolved seeds. His specialty is wheat, barley and other cereals, bred for dry and hot climates—precisely the conditions that many of the earth’s food-growing lands now face as climate change raises the temperature and disrupts precipitation patterns.

ICARDA was based in Tal Hadya, a town about 20 miles outside of Aleppo, until it was finally abandoned last year when the city became a focus of the Assad government’s brutal counter-offensive against Syrian rebels, including the Islamic State. Ceccarelli was gone by the time the last Syrian scientists were forced to evacuate, but he had ensured that at least a part of the seed bank’s legacy lives on in Italy. (ICARDA’s work continues in Morocco and Lebanon and a collection of its seeds is stored at the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in Norway).

“Within four growing seasons, the two populations growing in different parts of Italy showed significantly different characteristics, a live illustration of the adaptation process.”

n each one of those sacks Ceccarelli took from Syria were dozens of different wheat varieties. Working with a Tuscany-based NGO, the Rural Seed Network (Reto Semali Rurali, RSR) Ceccarelli arranged to have the seeds planted with a farmer in Sicily and another in Tuscany.

The RSR and a coalition of environmental NGOs from the UK, Germany, Austria, Denmark, and France went to work lobbying in Brussels, to convince the European Council of Ministers – the EU’s executive body—to amend a key provision which requires that all seeds sold in Europe be registered as single seeds with uniform, distinct and stable characteristics. In other words, each seed remains uniform and distinct from other varieties year after year, a registration requirement that is also a key precursor to what is often the next step—patenting. But this uniformity, the coalition argued, makes them uniquely unsuited to the extreme volatility in growing conditions being wrought by climate change—a hot-button question in Italy and throughout much of Europe, which has been facing record-breaking temperatures and, in some regions including Italy, a multi-year drought.

In 2014, the coalition succeeded. The EU agreed to waive those registration requirements on four crops for what it described as “a temporary experiment … for the marketing of populations of the plant species wheat, barley, maize and oats.” For the first time, populations of seeds, evolving and changing and sharing genes in the ways that plants do naturally, could be registered for sale.

The Syrian seeds have already provided a lesson in ‘Evolution 101′ on the Italian farms. Within four growing seasons, the two populations growing in different parts of Italy showed significantly different characteristics, a live illustration of the adaptation process, Ceccarelli said.

In Sicily, which receives a fraction of the rainfall of Tuscany, the wheat is maturing several weeks earlier, and is as many as two to four inches shorter than the Tuscan varieties, which, in the more moderate and moist climate, mature later and deliver more protein per plant.

“Compare the two in the same environment,” says Ceccarelli, “and it’s day and night.” Ceccarelli argues that its their diversity which gives the fields the ability to adapt to new conditions. “Explain to me how a crop that is uniform and stable responds to climate change?” he says. “Today if you are a dynamic seed company you are working on varieties for 2025. For which sort of climate? How many more degrees hotter will it be? Do they know what pests and diseases will come with the new conditions? These population mixtures are extremely dynamic, the cheapest and most dynamic way to cope with climate change.”

The experience of field inspecting a diverse population was a first for the seed inspectors in from Rome, recalled Riccardo Franciolini of the RSR. “It was interesting to see their response,” he said from the group’s headquarters near Florence. “We asked them to do the opposite of what they’re used to doing. They’re used to seeing a single variety, all the same in a field. But the idea of a ‘population’ changes the vision in a profound way.”

In June, the Italian Agriculture Ministry authorized the farmer in Sicily, Giuseppe li Rosi to sell up to two tons per year of the seeds cultivated there; the Tuscan farmer, Rosario Floriddia, could sell up to three tons per year of the seeds he had grown. The difference reflects the different yields of each of the two distinct populations, which of course had been just one single population back in Tel Hadya, Syria. At least 100 farmers are now growing the wheat from those seeds in Italy, according to Ceccarelli. The yields may not match bushel for bushel the yields of neighboring farms — many of which require intensive synthetic chemical inputs. But, he says, they’re showing “high rates of yield stability, year in and year out, which is what farmers care about.” And the bread and pastas made with their wheat are finding a budding market.

The movement is now bigger than the fields Ceccarelli seeded. The EU directive gives each member-state the right to authorize seed populations in the four designated crops. At least 20 such ‘cross-composite populations’—the technical term for them—have also received authorization from national seed authorities in the UK, Germany, Denmark and France, representing a total of about 300 to 400 tons of seed, according to Klaus Rapf, a Board Member and Adviser to Arche Noah (Noah’s Ark), a seed-saving and research institution in Austria that was part of the coalition fighting for the change. More exact totals won’t be known until next year, said Rapf, when the EU compiles all the registrations held by national authorities, in their respective languages, and releases the Europe-wide figures to the public. The registrations come after years of research throughout Europe comparing the performance and resilience of diverse versus single seed populations, including by Ceccarelli and other scientists.

The fields are now a long-running fuse that could present the first major challenge to the plant-patenting system in either Europe or the U.S., proponents believe. When the first phase of the experiment is completed, at the end of 2018, there will be an assessment of its success. The program could be expanded to other crops, sustained, or stopped.

If it continues beyond 2018, the global dimensions of the seed business suggest it would not take long for the principles to make their way into the United States, where similar research is underway. The experiment could force a reassessment of existing rules, which prioritize individual varieties. You can’t ‘patent’ a population, or at least in ways that patents are currently defined. Populations are dynamic, changing in response to changing conditions—unlike hybrids or genetically engineered seeds, the patenting of which has been the foundation for the companies that now dominate the global seed trade, and which rely on standardized regulations to export their seeds.

“What’s at stake is the very concept of ‘variety’,” said Klaus Rupf of Arche Noah. “Defining something as a ‘variety’ is an abstract concept created to defend turning a seed into a protected intellectual property, based on the notion of very high uniformity.”

Or, as Ceccarelli puts it, “We are registering and certifying something that is evolving—next year will be different. You start with one thing and you end up with another thing totally different … Yes, it is a little radical,” he said.

How Seeds from War-Torn Syria Could Help Save American Wheat

This blog post and all media within were re-posted with permission from Mark Schapiro. For the original article Visit: e360.yale.edu

Stories arising from reporting by Mark Schapiro for his new book, SEEDS OF RESISTANCE: The Fight for our Food Supply, to be published by Skyhorse Publishing/Hotbooks in September 2018.

As temperatures rise, pests and diseases are moving north into the U.S. heartland, killing crops and diminishing yields. To combat this, researchers are turning to a wild grass variety whose seeds were smuggled out of Syria as the bombs fell.

When a team of researchers set loose a buzzing horde of Hessian flies on 20,000 seedlings in a Kansas greenhouse, they made a discovery that continues to ripple from Midwestern wheat fields to the rolling hills that surround the battered Syrian city of Aleppo. The seeds once stored in a seed bank outside of that now largely destroyed city could end up saving United States wheat from the disruptions triggered by climate change — and look likely to, soon enough, make their way into the foods that Americans eat.

According to the National Climatic Data Center, from 2000 to 2015, average temperatures in the Midwest rose from 1 to 2 degrees Fahrenheit above what had been the 20th-century average. Periods of time between rainfalls are lengthening, according to a 2016 assessment by the EPA. In other words, conditions in some areas of the Midwest are starting to resemble conditions in the Mideast.

Rising temperatures are already leading to drops in Midwestern crop yields that could, under current medium and high emissions scenarios, lead to further drops of as much as 4 percent per year. In the heart of U.S. cereal and grain country, new pests and diseases are following the hot and dry conditions northward — and frequently overwhelming the ability of agricultural chemicals to battle them off. In response, scientists are seeking sources of natural resistance — and finding them in Syria, in the heart of the Fertile Crescent, the birthplace of domesticated agriculture.

As Aleppo was being bombed, U.S. researchers were receiving reports from Midwestern farmers of crops damaged by the Hessian fly.

One of the world’s most important seed banks used to be located in Syria, about 25 miles west of Aleppo in the town of Tal Hadya, and was run by the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). That UN-affiliated center specializes in preserving and researching seeds in hot, dry areas — conditions now being faced by many of the earth’s food-growing regions.

It’s also the place of origin of today’s domesticated wheat, and thus the seeds that were stored there benefit from germplasm embedded with survival strategies developed over thousands of years of changing conditions and evolving pathogens. Now, diseases and pests long familiar to Middle and Near Eastern farmers are moving north from the southern U.S. and Mexico and are surging across Kansas and surrounding states — Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, and Nebraska and in some instances up to Illinois and the Dakotas.

The Hessian fly has been around for more than two centuries — since, in fact, the birth of the U.S.. It’s thought by entomologists to have come to North America with the straw bedding of Hessian mercenaries who fought on behalf of the British during the Revolutionary War, hence the name. It’s been a menace ever since, but mostly in warmer climates in the South.

Even as forces supporting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad were bombing Aleppo in the spring of 2016, researchers at Kansas State University (KSU) in Manhattan, Kansas, were receiving increasingly urgent reports from U.S. Midwestern wheat farmers of devastating attacks by the Hessian fly, leading to an average 10 percent yield loss per year, according to the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Applied Wheat Genomics at KSU. That’s a significant bite out of the earnings of farms already operating on shaky margins, and it’s just one among several mounting threats to the vast, monochromatic fields of Midwestern wheat.

Ming-Shun Chen, a professor of molecular entomology at KSU, explained that the flies’ larvae used to be killed off by the cold of winter. But that cold is coming later in the season, and the larvae survive to turn into flies. Their devouring of wheat seems drawn from science fiction: The flies don’t have teeth, so they inject a protein-based substance into the plant which transforms it into a kind of nutritious slurry they can suck up and digest. “They transform the leaf into something they can eat,” explained Chen. The substance has the effect of stunting the plant’s growth and accelerating the metabolization of chlorophyll — an infested plant becomes more green, a surefire sign of the presence of the fly. “The plant’s metabolic pathway is changed,” said Chen. “It no longer produces nutrients for its own growth, but produces nutrients for the insects.” Darkening green in a field of golden wheat is now a scary color in Kansas.

From November through April, Chen collaborated with plant scientist Jesse Poland, director of the Lab for Applied Wheat Genomics, to run a sequence of experiments that unfolded in the university’s greenhouses with brutal Darwinian efficiency: They planted commercial U.S. wheat seedlings from Kansas and surrounding states along with an assortment of wild wheat-related grasses obtained from the seed vault in Syria, as well as random other assorted plantings. The seedlings grew for two to three weeks, and then the flies were unleashed to attack. The results were clear: A wild relative of wheat, known as Aegilops tauschii, a common grass in Syria, was the sole variety that could withstand the Hessian fly onslaught to any significant degree.

Wheat has the most complex genome of any of the world’s major crops, one of the reasons efforts to genetically engineer wheat traits have thus far not succeeded, as they have with corn, soybeans and other crops. It also means it has multiple genetic relatives. Those so-called ‘crop wild relatives’ are turning out to be critical tools for breeders as food-growing areas around the world face an unprecedented spectrum of new conditions.

“Wheat’s relatives are closely related to what was domesticated,” says Jesse Poland. “The difference is that domestication selected for genes and traits that increase productivity, but during that process they lost qualities of resistance to diseases and insects.” Those hyper-productive varieties, dependent on agrichemical boosters, are showing their weakness in the face of new diseases and pests. So breeders are reaching deep into the history of wheat, as they are for other crops, to bring back some of those lost characteristics.

“Wild [crop] relatives are by definition hardier,” says one scientist. “They’ve survived on the margins of our pampering.”

“Wild relatives are by definition hardier. They’ve survived on the margins of our pampering,” comments Maywa Montenegro, a recently minted PhD in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management at the University of California, Berkeley, who has devoted years of study to wild relatives of crops. “On a farm, the farmer does everything to favor his crops, he pulls out competitor plants, weeds, gives water. But the wild relatives haven’t been getting assistance for thousands of years. They’re dealing with drought and flooding and salt. By definition these are hardy species.” She said that indigenous farmers have for millennia encouraged wild species to grow along the edges of their farms in order to encourage inter-breeding between the wild and domesticated species to confer those strengths — a practice that has been long-neglected on massive industrial farms, for which wild species look simply like tangles of unnecessary plants.

One of those plants is the indomitable ancient grass Aegilops tauschii, which grows wild in Syria in the hills surrounding Tal Hadya and Aleppo, and all the way up to the Caucasus — the breadth of the Fertile Crescent, and the birthplace of wheat. Poland cites a litany of diseases to which the grass is resistant, with names like a lineup of underground rock bands: barley yellow dwarf, mosaic virus, wheat rust. A further list of pest-resistance traits published last year by a collaborative team of scientists from the Institute of Crop Germplasm and Biotechnology in China and the Land Institute, which has been conducting long-term research on resilient grasses and cereals in Kansas, concluded that tauschii shows resistance traits to more than half a dozen common insect pests, including the cereal leaf beetle, the root lesion nematode, stem rust, yellow rust, and, as the team at Kansas State also discovered, the Hessian fly. Seventy percent of the Syrian Aegopolis tauschii, said Chen, resisted the fly attacks, and no pesticide was needed to do the job. “It seems to have the ability,” he said, “to detect one of the components of the substance injected by the fly and mount a defense. The fly is unable to get nutrients from the plant, and so it starves to death.”

The tauschii and thousands of other seed varieties once stored at ICARDA’s Tal Hadya seed bank have a dramatic recent history, intertwined with the Syrian civil war. The area around Aleppo was a rebel stronghold until 2016. The rebel commander in Tal Hadya, according to one of the veteran scientists who used to work at the ICARDA facility, was himself a farmer and understood the importance of the seed bank. The scientists and the rebels struck a deal: The rebels protected the seed bank and, equally important, ensured that the generator kept running to keep the stored seeds cool — in return for the scientists providing the rebels with food grown from the center’s experimental fields. That lasted until the spring of 2016, when Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s military started bombarding Aleppo and the surroundings towns, including Tal Hadya. The remaining scientists loaded up the seeds in a truck and raced across the Lebanese frontier, where Ahmed Amri, director of genetic resources at ICARDA, was waiting on the other end to receive them.

“You know you don’t need a big truck for seeds, they’re small,” recalled Amri, on a Skype call from Beirut. “Nine boxes, 6,000 accessions, on one small truck.” Small, but each box was loaded with the potential to help the world navigate the tumultuous times ahead. Amri now oversees growing some of the Syrian seeds in the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon, as well as at an ICARDA center on the outskirts of his home city of Rabat, Morocco. “We’re trying to reconstruct those Syrian and Iraqi varieties before they disappear,” he said. Amri received his PhD decades ago from KSU, which is now planting seeds — many of them obtained before 2016 — that he once oversaw at Tal Hadya in Syria.

A U.S. study found diversity in seed varieties has dropped in almost every region of the country, most dramatically in the Midwest.

Other seeds emanating from Syria are helping farmers contend with climatic changes elsewhere in the Midwest. In Illinois and the Dakotas, for example, the combination of increasing temperatures with brief but intense rainfalls is leading to the proliferation of a virulent fungus, Fusarium head blight, which thrives in hot, moist conditions and destroys wheat plants by attaching itself to roots and stems. “The modern wheat varieties are not doing well with climate change and our crazy rain events,” said Bill Davison, who has been working to devise responses to the accelerating spectrum of environmental stresses faced by Illinois farmers at the University of Illinois Extension Service in Bloomington. Once again, Syrian seeds seem to be performing strongly in the Midwest’s stressed circumstances. “The Fertile Crescent varieties are withstanding these conditions well,” he said. Similarly, efforts are underway at the University of North Dakota, Bismarck, to introduce Syrian germplasm, showing high resistance to the Fusarium fungus, into the breeding stock.

Such varieties promise to be increasingly valuable “as climate stresses create increasing environmental instability,” says Charlie Brummer, who runs the Center for Plant Breeding at the University of California, Davis, and has overseen many breeding experiments with wild relatives of crops. “As those stresses recur more frequently and become more prevalent, I think that wild relatives like tauschii will be increasingly important to deal with the problems induced by climate change.”

An ironic twist to the saga of wheat’s wild relations is that the agriculture they’re intended to save could be partially responsible for destroying entire communities of wild relatives that are critical to their future and that of other crops in the turbulent times ahead. “If Midwestern monoculture farming practices are ever adopted in Syria, Iraq, or wherever in the Fertile Crescent,” says Brummer, “that will push more of those wild relatives off the land. Then we have a problem. Another source of variation, and all the traits of selective advantage, will be lost… Germplasm banks are just a sampling of the wild. If the wild goes away, we can’t go back and get another sample.”

The U.S. has been losing diversity at an alarming rate for more than three decades: An assessment by scientists at Kansas State and North Dakota State, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, found that after three decades of consolidation in the seed industry, and the steadily expanding size of farms, diversity in seed varieties has dropped in almost every region of the country, most dramatically in the lower Midwest. Globally, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization has declared that three-quarters of all the world’s crop varieties that were around in the early 1900s had become extinct by 2015. “You may be using wild crop relatives to boost industrial agriculture, while industrial agriculture itself is one of the greatest pressures on their existence,” commented Maywa Montenegro. “They’re threatened from the usual pressures — pollution, land-cover changes — but also from turning diverse fields into monoculture plantations.”

Poland says that the latest round of Hessian fly experiments, completed in early April, affirmed KSU’s plan to incorporate the tough survivors of the fly onslaught into the breeding of commercial American wheat varieties. After undergoing formal certification and USDA approval, the Aegilops tauschii will be dispersed to U.S. breeders to make their way into the besieged fields of the Midwest.

This article was produced in collaboration with the Food & Environment Reporting Network, a non-profit investigative journalism organization.

Earth Day author conversation: Radical Joy for Hard Times

This blog post and all media within were re-posted with permission from Trebbe Johnson and North Atlantic Books. you can find the original article here. For More from North Atlantic Books Visit: www.northatlanticbooks.com

by Julia Sadowski

As we approach Earth Day 2018, many of us here at NAB have environmental issues on the brain and are in the midst of planning our own Earth Day agendas. Whether picking up trash at a beach, volunteering at a local farm or even visiting a place affected by climate change, there are so many ways to show up for the environment. Writer and activist Trebbe Johnson, author of the upcoming book Radical Joy for Hard Times: Finding Meaning and Making Beauty in Earth’s Broken Places, took a moment to talk about her work using art and ritual to honor Earth’s wounded places.

What is your definition of a “wounded place” and why do you think it is so important that we spend time with them?

A wounded place is any place we feel attached to and that is now damaged or endangered. A wounded place might be a wilderness trail you hiked once that was littered with trash, or it might be the ash tree in your own backyard that had to be cut down because it was infested with the emerald ash borer. It might be a farm that’s been industrialized by the gas fracking industry or an urban community where a hazardous waste incinerator is about to be built. We have a deep emotional connection to the places in our lives. As the Australian philosopher Freya Mathews writes, these places “hold” us. When something happens to them, we feel grief, outrage, fear, stress. Often, the tendency is to hide those feelings, because, “Is it even appropriate to cry over a place?” Or we begin to ignore them. Deep down, we feel that this beloved place has abandoned us, and so we, in turn, abandon it. But a deep emotional connection remains with this place, and by actually going to visit it, as we would to a sick friend—which is what the places we love are—we discover that—surprise!—we strengthen the connection in a new, more creative way. Giving attention and beauty to wounded places is especially important now, when we are all dealing with both local ecological assaults and the huge threat of climate change. There are many ways of resisting and of working to develop important, sustainable ways of living under these challenges. But ultimately, what better way is there to assure not only our survival, but what I like to call our thrival, than to cultivate new relationships with these places that have given so much to us, as well as with ourselves and one another, than by giving back to them our creativity, attention, and sense of play and adventure?

When people think about a decimated forest or a former zinc smelter, “beauty” is often not what comes to mind. How do people create beauty in a devastated place that is so different from the place they originally fell in love with?

In my new book, I talk about different kinds of beauty. And, actually, the quest to find beauty in devastated places is a whole new kind of practice, a whole new discipline. Often, our judgment gets in the way of our ability to see beauty, like: “This is an old-growth clear-cut forest! What’s wrong with me that I am finding the silvery color of the stumps beautiful?” Sometimes, too, the damage itself is weirdly lovely, for example the luminous colors of the toxic water in the Gulf of Mexico after the BP oil spill in 2010. Sometimes we see humans or animals doing their touching best to thrive under difficult conditions, and that is beautiful. And when we actually make beauty for the place—that’s when we feel truly uplifted and, yes, joyful.

You discuss the importance of accepting places how they are now, not just remembering them for what they once were. Why is this acceptance so crucial to your work and in what way is it radical?

This question of acceptance has been a controversial aspect of the work! Some people claim that to accept a damaged place for what it is is to take a passive stance in the face of all that’s happening in the world. But really, it’s just the opposite. You have to accept the reality of any situation before you can truly be in a vital, engaged relationship with it—or act to change it. That’s true of accepting a scary medical diagnosis or the end of a love affair or the decreased beauty and vitality of the place you love. When I accept a place as it is, looking for the beauty it holds even now, and then express my consolation or gratitude by giving back some physical token of appreciation, several things happen. I realize what I can change and what I can’t change. I see the place for what it is, not what I wish it were or how I remember it. And, to go back again to the comparison with a sick friend—when your friend is ill, you don’t (hopefully you don’t) turn away from her. You go and sit with her, find out what her life is like now, and tell her about your life, hold her hand, just be with her. We can do the same kind of thing for places that are ailing. This approach is radical because it’s such a departure from how much of modern culture has been dealing with environmental damage over the past 50 years. We’ve concentrated on cleaning up the messes and staving off even worse situations, and we have not been attentive to the living places among us and our living relationships with them. Even as we work to change our current circumstances into something better, we can always find and make beauty in the here and now.

In the book you talk about holding Earth Exchanges. Can you explain what these are? Who can hold them?

An Earth Exchange is a simple way of exchanging gifts with a place. The place reveals itself to us in its current state—clearcut, polluted, overdeveloped—and we give back to it through sharing our stories with friends while we’re there and creating a simple gift for the place. The great thing about an Earth Exchange is that you can do it alone or with a large group. You can do it spontaneously or plan it for weeks in advance. You don’t need any kind of expertise, and you don’t have to haul in a lot of equipment. Plus, the place itself provides all the materials you need for your gift: sticks, stones, flowers, sand, driftwood. Many people make beauty out of trash which they then remove from the site. As I mentioned earlier, on June 16, we’ll have our annual Global Earth Exchange, when people all over the world do this practice, each in their own way. In Kabul, Afghanistan, a group of young peace activists take care of their permaculture garden. In Bali, members of a mountain village do a road clean-up or hold a traditional ceremony. In Oregon a group visits a clear-cut forest, in Missouri they make a mural for a town that was damaged by floods, in Texas a woman makes beauty for a neighborhood bordered by a lot of refineries. It’s a very inspiring, empowering event.

You lead workshops internationally. Is there a particular “wounded place” that inspires your work?

Our organization empowers and encourages others to go to the hurt places they love and give them gifts of spontaneous creativity. I myself live in a rural, conservative county in northeastern Pennsylvania, where there is a lot of gas drilling activity. But I am constantly noticing wounded places wherever I go, and my heart always goes out to them. And I find that, when I pause long enough to give them even the least little bit of attention and some simple offering, that I fall in love with the place. People all over the world—people with very diverse backgrounds, religions, cultures—have written us the same thing, that they tend to love their place even more when they’ve attended to it a bit. Every year in June—this year it’s June 16—we hold the Global Earth Exchange, a day when people around the world go to places that have fallen on hard times and make simple gifts of beauty for them. We put the stories and photos on the website and social media, and there’s a tremendous sense of camaraderie among all these diverse people who have taken some time to express their love for a place in fun, collaborative ways. There’s more information on our website—radicaljoyforhardtimes.org.

Do you think your work mourning environmentally devastated places is aligned with the broader environmental activism movement? Radical Joy for Hard Times is not directly about fighting carbon emissions, per se, but are the efforts at all interrelated?

Well, I want to emphasize that mourning is only part of what we do, and that may not even be a response for every person or in every circumstance. What we’re focused on is getting reacquainted with these loved, hurt places, spending time with them without busily trying to fix them, listening to them and to our own responses to them. The human relationship with nature is very rich, textured, ever unfolding. It’s emotional and physical and spiritual and practical. Radical Joy for Hard Times takes into account all these many aspects of our relationship to places. Personally, I think that all efforts to protect, love, and serve the Earth are aligned. I also think it’s possible to practice finding and making beauty for a place no matter what your particular focus or approach is. A large demonstration at an open-pit coal mine, for example, could include all the participants joining together in a song for the land or working together to create a mandala out of natural objects.

How are you celebrating Earth Day 2018?

This year I’ll be participating in Stephen Blackmer’s Earth Day service at his Church of the Woods in Canterbury, New Hampshire. Stephen was named “Priest of the Trees” in an article in Harper’s a couple of years ago. His congregation meets not in a building but in the woods and wetlands, the natural places that were the very first temples of all our ancestors and that continue to evoke awe and a sense of interconnectedness for so many of us. I’ve written about the link between spirituality and nature in the past, so I’m very excited about this opportunity to do a service with Stephen’s congregation. For the past few Earth Days, we’ve been having a clean-up in my little village of just under 300 people, so we’ll probably keep up that good tradition sometime during the week before the official Earth Day.

Radical Joy for Hard Times: Finding Meaning and Making Beauty in Earth’s Broken Places by Trebbe Johnson, published by North Atlantic Books, copyright © 2018 by Trebbe Johnson. Pre-order your copy here.

This article was written by Julia Sadowski

Julia is a Massachusetts native who thoroughly enjoys living on the west coast. After graduating from Mount Holyoke College with a BA in Politics, she spent time living in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where she supported in a third grade classroom as an AmeriCorps member. She eventually made her way to California, and before joining NAB, was the Event Coordinator at Books Inc in Berkeley. She loves working at NAB, and in particular enjoys helping to spread the word about new and exciting books! She also enjoys practicing yoga, reading advance copies of books long after their publication dates, and eating all of the delicious food Berkeley has to offer.

California’s Champions: Remarks by Terry Tamminen, CEO of the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation

This blog post and all media within were re-posted with permission from Ten Strands. you can find the original article here. For More from Ten Strands Visit: Tenstrands.org/news

The following are excerpts from the keynote address Terry Tamminen, CEO of the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, gave at the California Science Teachers Association 2017 Conference in Sacramento on Friday, October 13, 2017.

BY TERRY TAMMINEN

The Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation (LDF) is working around the globe on species protection and conservation issues, climate change, and empowering indigenous and local activists. But nothing we do is more important than advancing the cause of ecoliteracy.

All of the environmental challenges we face have one thing in common: they are caused by environmental illiteracy. But I also believe that these problems can be fought with a secret weapon: all of you!

Since the first Earth Day in 1970, governments and non-governmental organizations have spent countless hours and billions of dollars to try to educate the public via the news media and other information channels, field trips outside of the classroom, documentaries, and museum exhibits. Yet so far, this investment has made very little difference in slowing down the march of devastating climate change impacts and the loss of natural habitat and species. In part this is because up to now great environmental education efforts and programs have been very well researched, documented, and scientifically sound, but overall remain uncoordinated.

To get lasting and large-scale change, we need to turn the tide in America and beyond. We need to combine these programs—like so many oars rowing the boat in the same direction to make it go faster and not just in circles—and take them directly to the decision-makers of the future: our students in public schools. There are no shortcuts.

That’s why LDF has chosen to invest in organizations working with the State of California, because we believe California has unique tools to assist teachers in teaching science using the environment for context and we know that environmental literacy and science are inextricably intertwined. Moreover, science teachers in California have influence beyond their classrooms and even beyond their state. I have seen first-hand how California is an environmental leader in the US and around the world. As you know, California is the sixth-largest economy in the world with the largest population of any US state—over 12% of the entire country lives here—and the biggest school system with over 6 million public school students, producing about 400,000 graduates each year who go out into the world and begin to influence others.

We believe, as I’m sure you do, students who are environmentally literate will make informed decisions as consumers and voters, be better stewards of their own environment, and will be equipped to take advantage of green STEM-related job opportunities.

One example of this is Leonardo DiCaprio. He was inspired as a young boy by the things he learned about nature in science class at school in Los Angeles. He credits his childhood teachers with helping instill in him a passion to protect the environment (oh yes, and to go into acting).

And my connection to science education and environmental literacy in California is also personal. Supporting the implementation of former Senator Fran Pavley’s Education and the Environment Initiative law is how I met my wife Leslie, one of the architects of that law!

The importance of environmental literacy may best be illustrated by the level of illiteracy that exists around climate change, and the very real impacts to the planet and economy that result. California teachers are especially critical in helping students understand climate change and to fundamentally alter this dynamic. Today only 45% of American adults think climate change is a “very serious problem” and in China, which is the world’s top greenhouse gas polluter after the US, barely 18% classify climate change as an issue.

But who can blame people who have not been educated about how these issues relate to them and their families—and if they are motivated to take action how to be good stewards of the environment, how to make informed choices, or how to elect leaders who understand science and will base their policies on facts?

I need not tell you that climate scientists warned us for decades that increased warming of the planet caused by our carbon emissions would result by the early 21stcentury in things such as more severe and damaging storms, longer-lasting droughts, and year-round wildfires. Indeed, 2017 will set new records for all of those predictions and the breathtaking toll on human life ecosystems and the economy—all because we failed to heed the science and take action sooner.

Which raises the question of why? In addition to a general lack of climate science taught in schools or to decision-makers in all walks of life, we are also up against the climate-denial industry that is pouring millions of dollars into the education system in states across the country—a denial industry that is emboldened by the Trump administration which is empowering people and policies that openly question the truth and urgency of climate science predictions.

It’s therefore more important than ever that California continues to lead the nation in its commitment to having a science, civics, and environmentally literate population, especially as coordinated anti-science policy across the country is a growing threat which is the result of a very simple three-part strategy by climate deniers: Money + Media = Laws.

  • Money: A 2013 study by Drexel University found that 140 foundations funneled $558 million to almost 100 climate-denial organizations from 2003 to 2010. I recommend you read Dark Money by Jane Mayer for much more information on the resources lined up against science and common sense.
  • Media: Money is pumped into conservative-leaning news media like Breitbart and National Review to question the consensus science of climate change.
  • Laws: And that combination of deep, dark pockets plus misleading media leads to voters and lawmakers who are fooled or emboldened to take the nation backwards. For example, the fossil-fuel funded American Legislative Exchange Commission, better known as ALEC, has been drafting anti-science bills for decades—such as the dubiously named “Environmental Literacy Improvement Act.” Language from these sample pieces of legislation has been used by biased lawmakers around the country.

Perhaps the most terrifying aspect of the laws drafted from these examples is their vagueness. The language of bills in Oklahoma, Indiana, Alabama, Idaho, and Texas includes terms like “academic freedom” and “controversial subjects” to disguise the true purpose of these laws, which is to give educators permission to stray from established peer-reviewed science on climate change and evolution toward theories that align more with their personal ideologies but are not based in science. If passed, these types of laws undo much of the hard work being done in states to get the Next Generation Science Standards adopted.

And lest you think that legislative templates don’t become actual laws let me give you just two examples.

  • Last May the Alabama Senate voted to adopt House Joint Resolution 78 which empowers state and local education authorities to promote the “academic freedom” of science teachers in the state’s public schools to say that “Biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning” are considered “controversial.”
  • And New Mexico’s Public Education Department recently unveiled a proposed replacement to its statewide science standards, including guidelines to minimize teaching of the rise in global temperatures, remove references to human activity as the primary driver of climate change, remove or weaken the mere mention of evolution, and remove references to the actual age of the Earth as being 4.6 billion years.And now this blending of money and media has gone in another direction even more direct and insidious. This year the climate misinformation movement is directly contacting teachers. Here’s a recent mailing by the Heartland Institute, its report entitled, “Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming,” sent to 200,000 teachers across the US. Of course there is no real disagreement when the world’s scientists under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have concluded with more than 99% certainty that climate change is real and humans are the primary cause. In fact it’s hard to find almost any other scientific endeavor that has more consensus around those facts except perhaps that the world is no longer thought to be flat!It’s worth spending a few moments on the disinformation campaign of the Heartland Institute because you need to recognize the difference between propaganda and valuable supplemental materials you might receive. The Heartland Institute is spending an estimated $3 million to $6 million on a direct-mail marketing campaignto get this professionally-produced junk science publication into the hands of public school teachers who teach science in the US. The look and feel of this bogus report is very similar to the front covers of science instructional materials, even California’s own Education and the Environment Initiative Curriculum.But while I’m sure you are all too smart for that, unfortunately many of your peers in other states are led astray. An independent report commissioned by Scholastic on the preferences of teachers in using supplemental education materials states that a whopping 8 out of 10 teachers will open and evaluate unsolicited teaching materials. A report last year in Science showed that just barely half of US science teachers teach that humans are responsible for climate change, and at least a third give mixed messages to students suggesting that scientists believe that natural factors are responsible.Why? Well, one answer might be found in a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science which says that religious and political beliefs override education when it comes to accepting the mainstream science of climate change.Given all this, what can we do? What can you do to teach science in the face of such well-funded misinformation? There are many reasons for hope in California:
    • The National Science Teachers Association encourages science teachers to send them the unsolicited propaganda from the Heartland Institute and they will recycle it! In return teachers will receive free access to their ebook, Ocean’s Effect on Weather and Climate. And, we commend CSTA for its position on Climate Change.
    • To further combat misinformation, the Alliance for Climate Education has resources and plans to roll out lesson plans and in-class activities to accompany new video resources to support teachers in this area, as well as a “rapid response” curriculum to support teachers to teach climate in areas of the country that were recently hit by hurricanes and other climate-related events as they unfold.
    • And even more significantly, California’s Next Generation Science Standards (CA-NGSS) support climate change education, and this position is further reinforced by the presence of California’s Environmental Principles and Concepts (EP&Cs) in the new Science Framework. This means that as educators you do not need to hold back on teaching students about how human activities affect global warming, and that decisions to reduce the impacts of global warming depend on understanding climate science, engineering capabilities, and social dynamics.
  • These EP&Cs are unique to California and were created as a result of the 2003 passage of California’s Education and the Environment Initiative Law. They examine the interdependence of human societies and natural systems and appreciate systems thinking and the connection and interdependence between humans and their environment.
  • These EP&Cs have been integrated into the 2016 Science Framework and 2016 History–Social Science Framework, and will significantly be integrated into the science and history–social science instructional materials during the next adoption. The California Department of Education also engaged a multiyear, multistakeholder process to develop California’s Blueprint for Environmental Literacy.

Superintendent Tom Torlakson appointed the Environmental Literacy Steering Committee to implement the Blueprint statewide. LDF knows that EP&Cs, committees, and you educators won’t accomplish the goal of ecoliteracy alone, so that’s why we are proud to work with non-government organizations like Ten Strands, TreePeople, and others who are partnering with state agencies and state public schools.

It’s also why we have committed $3 million over three years to help all of you achieve the vision for true, widespread environmental literacy. Those funds support teaching science in the context of the environment by providing professional development focusing on school districts as the unit of change, linking nonformal providers of environmental education and green employers to schools, and helping districts access funding.

Does this approach work? Take for example Katherin Konomi (4th Grade Teacher), from the Burlingame School District, who said, “My biggest accomplishment as a teacher was learning how to take students outside of the classroom to work on science. It is the biggest learning experience you can offer your students. I was able to comprehend that you don’t need a big and elaborate lesson to take students outside. Taking students into their environment to observe dirt and rocks can have such a huge impact on fostering the relationship of your students to the world of science.”

Or Jose Flores, a high school teacher at Brawley Unified School District, who reports how students might use this education: “Students can truly have a voice, and express that voice by attending school board and city council meetings to engage in civil discourse with their elected officials to enact positive change in their community in addressing social and environmental issues.”

Those testimonials are validation of both the California Common Core State Standards and the CA-NGSS which emphasize the importance of student-centered instruction, hands-on learning, and real-world learning experiences. Environment-based science and history–social science education using engaging local contexts offer a powerful entry point for such experiences that students never forget.

In sum, we know this is hard work even without the misinformation campaigns working against us or the fact that we’re starting all of this too late to educate the last generation of voters, consumers, educators, and activists who might have prevented some of the impacts of climate change and species extinction that we are already witnessing. There are no shortcuts, but California and LDF have given you tools, and we hope you will use them.

Shakespeare wrote, “There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune.” I pose to you that we are upon such a sea at this moment and it is only ecoliteracy that can help everyone understand this tide and shape our future…before it shapes us. And I believe that you are our champions who will teach the next generation to do just that. Thank you!

This article was written by Terry Tamminen

From his youth in Australia to career experiences in Europe, Africa, China, and across the United States, Terry has developed expertise in business, farming, education, non-profit, the environment, the arts, and government. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed him Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency and later Cabinet Secretary, the Chief Policy Advisor to the Governor, where Terry was the architect of many groundbreaking sustainability policies, including California’s landmark Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, the Hydrogen Highway Network, and the Million Solar Roofs initiative. In 2010 Terry co-founded the R20 Regions of Climate Action, a new public-private partnership, bringing together sub-national governments, businesses, financial markets, NGOs, and academia to implement measurable, large-scale, low-carbon and climate resilient economic development projects that can simultaneously solve the climate crisis and build a sustainable global economy. Since 2007 he has provided advice to Pegasus Capital Advisors and numerous global businesses on sustainability and “green” investing. In 2016, Terry joined the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation as CEO. An accomplished author, Terry’s books include “Cracking the Carbon Code: The Keys to Sustainable Profits in the New Economy” (Palgrave Macmillan). In 2011, Terry was one of six finalists for the Zayed Future Energy Prize and The Guardian ranked Terry No. 1 in its “Top 50 People Who Can Save the Planet.”

Lyla June: Warrior for Peace

Lyla June is a Native American (Dine´/ Cheyenne) poet, peacemaker, musician and activist dedicated to revitalizing spiritual relationships with Mother Earth and cultivating forgiveness and reconciliation. We’re pleased to be hosting her on the main stage at the 2018 Bioneers Conference for a keynote address this fall. However, this year will not be Lyla’s first appearance at Bioneers…


In 2011, I organized the first annual Poetry Slam at the Bioneers Conference Youth Unity Center, which has evolved into a brave space where youth challenge the system, reveal personal trauma in search of healing and articulate their aspirations for a better world.

My original vision was a much smaller one, a competition among poets with audience members deciding who would advance to the next round with one winner emerging from the final round.

The Thursday before that first poetry slam, I met Lyla June at Just Us for Food Justice (JU4FJ), a one-day Bioneers event where young food justice activists meet, build the movement, learn inner resilience skills and share stories. Gerardo Marin, whose big heart and clear thinking make him a close ally to many Bay Area front line activists, invited Lyla to lead the spoken word session at JU4FJ. Lyla kicked off the session with a poem she wrote called Dawn that begins with:

“It’s dawn

the sun is conquering the sky

and my grandmother and I

are heaving prayers at the horizon”

The poem interprets the complex meaning of the word “hozho” from her Native Dine´ language, and is an awe-inspiring blend of traumatic history, sacred worldview and transformation. The power and beauty of Lyla’s words blew me away. I immediately invited her to the Poetry Slam.

Two days later at the Slam, not surprisingly, Lila was chosen as the winner. When she was being presented the $75 prize money, she said, “Screw winning, screw hierarchy!” and she began to share the money with all the other poets. This spontaneous act of revolt against the competitive structure ignited the audience. Without any prompting, audience members dug into their pockets to contribute to the purse, swelling the prize money to more than double its original amount, which was equitably distributed among all the poets.

I was delighted to see my original idea dismantled to have something much more elegant, respectful, and acknowledging take its place. Now at the Slam, it is common for seasoned poets, as well as first time poets, to rip open people’s hearts with their raw emotion and authenticity. It is a dynamic spontaneous place of celebration, hard truths, and healing.

On the Writing for Peace website Lyla wrote, “Writing for peace means: Praying before each line is written that the Great Spirit’s message comes through. The root word of genius is, ‘genie,’ or spirit. And so, the true genius does not take credit for her/his work. Rather s/he celebrates the fact that they were able to move out of the way enough for Spirit’s masterpiece to flow through them.” Lyla’s poetry is one way she expresses her dedication to forgiveness and fuels her passion as a non-violent warrior for peace.

At the 2017 Geography of Hope conference, Lyla spoke about the power of forgiveness, recalling her time as a Water Protector at Standing Rock when police fired rubber bullets; threw tear gas grenades; sprayed mace; attacked with dogs; and, in 20 degree temperatures, used fire hoses against non-violent protesters who were trying to protect the water supply and cultural artifacts of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe from the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

She described how she participated in a circle of forgiveness at the Morton County Jail where other Water Protectors were being held and where women were being strip searched. A thousand people surrounded the jail and “sang songs of forgiveness, of life, and beauty and healing.”

Lyla said, “We must forgive… but forgiveness does not mean you stop fighting for what is right. On the contrary, forgiveness allows you to fight more effectively for what is right and it cleanses you of the same hatred you are fighting against.”

We are excited and honored that Lyla June will be giving a keynote presentation at the 2018 Bioneers Conference, October 19-21.

The Redd on Salmon Street: Portland’s Local Food Hub

Traveling through Salmon Nation on my way to British Columbia, I stopped in Portland. Unlike the shabby, worn-out, warehouse districts in many cities, Portland’s Central Eastside seems lively and up-and-coming, filled with a variety of light industry serving local needs. Recently several coffee roasting operations, cafes and restaurants have opened up. Part of this entrepreneurial renaissance is The Redd, a food hub on Salmon Street developed by Ecotrust.

Salmon Nation, whose boundaries are defined as “where ever Pacific Salmon have run,” is a concept conceived by Ecotrust as a way for people to live in meaningful relationship with their ecoregion and to have life-affirming engagement with their neighbors, as is modeled by the lifecycle of salmon. The tagline is “People, fish and our common home.

Elizabeth Woody, Ecotrust’s Director of Indigenous Leadership, in the essay, Simple Customs of Salmon Nation,wrote “Salmon were the first to teach us of wealth… Their die-off generated the most biologically diverse forest on earth. For millions of years, salmon came and left this way. For eons, this monumental Giveaway brought us health and renewal.”

Trying to mimic those qualities of cooperation, renewal, generosity, and health within the contemporary economic system is akin to salmon swimming upstream against the current, nevertheless, Ecotrust is committed to building a restorative, equitable, regional, food system.

Emma Sharer once directed a national supply chain, and worked for a consumer packaged goods company and a granola bar company, but became disillusioned with global food export practices and found herself attracted to the idea of building regional economy. As The Redd’s Operation Manager, she is on a quest to figure out how to get everyone to work together and to identify the intersections that trigger new opportunities.

Ecotrust refurbished an old marble warehouse and redesigned it for mixed use space with shared offices for small to mid-size food companies who are getting started in Portland. There are about 100 small food companies using the warehouse and distribution space, everything from producers of nut butters, salads, seafood, and soup as well as FoodCorps, a national non-profit that provides nutrition education and school garden programming in schools.

B-line Sustainable Urban Delivery, one of the five anchor tenants, manages The Redd facility. Sharer said, “We told B-line, here’s the space, you guys pay us rent and run it. Figure it out and we’ll help you. We come in and play the activator/support role.” B-line distributes locally produced food products throughout the city on fourteen electric trikes.

“B-Line,” Sharer said, “has partnered with New Seasons, the biggest food retailer in Oregon, in a program called Green Wheels. Instead of having many small entrepreneurs load their Subarus and deliver them to New Seasons individually, they drop their inventory off here, B-Line aggregates it and distributes product.”

Fourteen patient private investors provided capital for the purchase and renovation of the building. They are willing to accept a slow, steady, modest return on investment as long as their money is having a positive environmental or social impact.

“Using business as a force for good” is an ethos held not only by the investors, but also by the small business owners at The Redd. After working as a psychiatric nurse in Oregon’s prison system, Betsy Langston became interested in Restorative Justice, a process that brings all parties together—victim, offender and community—to promote reconciliation and healing. A percent of Betsy’s Bar None business profits are donated to the Insight Prison Project to help their efforts in healing trauma, preventing violence and repairing broken lives. Emma Sharer used her supply chain expertise to help Betsy source more local ingredients. Now 95% of the ingredients for Betsy’s Bar None products are sourced from North America.

70% of Oregonians who live below the poverty line are women and children. Ground Up, another one of the The Redd’s businesses, is a nut butter company that has a six-to-nine-month program that hires and trains homeless women, providing job skills and building their confidence to help them transition out of homelessness.

The full vision for The Redd includes a second building, an old metal manufacturing plant next door that will be remodeled into be a public event space.

Sharer said that buying both buildings “is a really critical real estate investment because the value of the real estate has doubled in the last three to four years. We could make money and build apartments, but we don’t want to do that; we truly want to be a part of the Central East Side industrial community. How do we bring back the industry that was once here, but recreate it in an equitable, prosperous, regenerative way?”

But challenges exist, “Warehouse space in Portland,” Sharer explained, “is a whole lot more expensive than warehouse space outside of the city. Even though we’re charging below-market rates to our tenants, it’s really hard to pay rent, because rent here is a lot more expensive than if B-Line was out of the center of the city.”

Amanda Oborne, Ecotrust’s Vice President of Food and Farms, conducted an18-month- Infrastructure Gap Analysis to answer the question: Where could investment catalyze regional food system growth and development? That analysis led to the development of The Redd.

“It’s easy to get overwhelmed,” Oborne said, “with the magnitude of change required to meet the hopes and dreams many of us hold for our food system, but the surest antidote feels like digging in on a practical local solution, and connecting with others doing the same. The Redd is a space that invites and facilitates long-term collaboration by farmers, ranchers, fishers and entrepreneurs who hold a vision for an equitable, restorative food system on one hand, and provides a platform to engage regionally or nationally on the other. It feels both radical and practical, in a way that offers a pathway toward optimism and hope.”

Ten Strands Reflects on Their Bioneers 2017 Experience

This blog post and all media within were re-posted with permission from Ten Strands. For More from Ten Strands Visit: Tenstrands.org/news

By Kim Moon

Western societies will, in the end, be subservient to the land and what it can provide and teach. . .we will never know ourselves until we know where we are on this land. ~Paul Hawken

I was travelling, was halfway across the country when the Tubbs fire started in Northern California. The most destructive wildfire in California history, they say. Preceded by Hurricane Maria. Preceded by the Central Mexico Earthquake. Preceded by Hurricane Irma. This describes only this part of the globe. This describes only a one-month timeframe. This does not describe the devastating impact to landscapes that were levelled. This does not describe the people who lost their lives, nor those who survived and are currently struggling to continue doing so. In Puerto Rico alone there are 3.4 million American citizens in the midst of a humanitarian disaster, they say.

Apocalyptic is used by people on the ground, in all instances, to describe the places they had previously referred to as Home.

“At the end of the 1960s there was a huge backlash to the civil rights movement, and in that backlash the modern environmental movement emerged. Many of the white people who were involved were looking for ways to have some distance from the experience of the civil rights movement. It’s been more than 45 years, and the reintegration of the issues of the environment, and the issues of social and racial justice have been taking on a fierce new form. It’s one of the reasons that we have, now, the business of emerging social and racial justice movements coming together with environmental justice.” ~Carl Anthony

I returned to the place I call home to be present at the 2017 Bioneers Conference. This year Ten Strands, in collaboration with State Superintendent Tom Torlakson’s Environmental Literacy Steering Committee (ELSC), was invited to submit a session proposal. This is how we chose to show up in this space, described by Paul Hawken as, “central to the re-imagination of what it means to be human”:

ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY FOR ALL: The benefits of environmental and outdoor science education have been widely known for decades, but the cultural relevance of these experiences and access to them remains elusive for low-income communities, communities of color, and English language learners. This session introduces environmental literacy as an inclusive, relevant strategy within the K–12 public education system to help students learn to solve problems, improve their lives and communities, and make the world a better place. We will explore success stories and the possibility of bringing environmental literacy efforts to scale by cultivating community partnerships, meeting mainstream educational goals, and providing students with the capacity to act individually and with others to build ecologically sound, economically prosperous, and equitable communities for present and future generations.


Our panel discussion was moderated by ELSC Co-chair Craig Strang, Associate Director of the Lawrence Hall of Science, and included:

  • Carl Anthony (ELSC Member, Urban Habitat, Breakthrough Communities Project, Earth Island Institute, architect; oft referred to as Grandfather of the Environmental Justice movement);
  • Paloma Pavel, PhD (ELSC Member, President Earth House Center, Co-founder Breakthrough Communities Project);
  • Raquel Pinderhughes, PhD (Professor and Chair of Urban Studies and Planning Department at San Francisco State University, creator of the Roots of Success Curriculum);
  • Jose Flores (ELSC Member, Presidential Award-winning Brawley Union High School District teacher and committed student advocate); and
  • Juanita Chan (District Science Lead, Rialto Unified School District and passionate champion of student-centered learning).

Saturday morning’s keynote speakers included Bioneers Co-founders Nina Simons and Kenny Ausubel, Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!), and Heather McGhee (President of public policy organization Demos). In addition to her work with Demos, Ms. McGhee helped shape key provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. It was her talk, A New “We the People” for a Sustainable Future, that expressed so clearly and impactfully the issues that are—especially in rooms where economic and racial privilege (and all that word carries with it) are predominant—often avoided, sidelined, or otherwise left inadequately addressed.

“Our challenge today is to find the language that can link cultural diversity to a broad social movement that reflects the majority of the population in California—60% of whom are people of color. This is the challenge we all face as we pass the torch to the next generation who set out on this journey of making history for all of us.” ~Carl Anthony

This is a good time to pause and acknowledge the importance of language. There are words, words, and more words; they form and transform as we attempt to communicate, to reach common understanding with those with whom we hope to connect. Or influence. Or control. Ms. McGhee uses the term “hierarchy of human value” to speak about a deep truth about this country of ours, whose ascent to dominance would have been impossible without one particular group of people devaluing several others, from its inception all the way up to the present day. So when we, Ten Strands and the ELSC, speak of community, it is as students of the communities we seek to accompany.

“Accompaniment” is actually an umbrella term that includes a family of related practices: equality, listening, seeking consensus, and exemplary action. ~Staughton Lynd

Accompanying requires us to distinguish between frontline communities and impacted communities; to understand how referring to particular communities as ‘underserved’ or ‘vulnerable’ may be perceived as failing to recognize the power of people taking action within communities while perpetuating the language and intent of colonialism. It requires us, if we are outsiders, to listen carefully to what people with direct experience are saying, to respect how and when they want outside support, and to be sincere and consistent while doing so.


The Steering Committee’s work is organized around school districts as ‘units of change’, as a school district is one type of community. Teachers, students, school administrators, parents, governing boards, local businesses, and community-based organizations function together in a place, their place, in an effort to meet the social contract of free public high-quality education for our country’s youth. This is achieved to varying degrees, for a variety of reasons. Ms. McGhee effectively addresses the progressive retreat from public support, and traces it to the ways in which the word public has become a thinly-veiled trope for not-white:

Beginning in the 1970s, conservatives deployed a highly racialized strategy that relentlessly linked public institutions to undeserving minorities in order to undo the country’s social contract—one grounded in good government, strong unions, and regulated capitalism. In the New Deal and Great Society years, white majorities broadly supported activist government because they perceived it as helping people like themselves—hardworking, deserving, decent. But as government programs became available to people of color, conservatives saw that they could gain ground by dog whistling about welfare and criminals, using racially coded terms to invoke the specter of liberal government coddling people of color—the very groups whose fortunes seemed to be rising just as life was getting harder for the white working class in the 1970s. ~Ian Haney López & Heather McGhee

The nation’s public school system has felt the impact of this withdrawal, but State Superintendent Torlakson, himself a former classroom teacher, has convened a number of special task forces (including one that the ELSC evolved from) in an effort to fulfill the promise of quality public education for California’s 6 million K–12 students. Besides the Blueprint for Environmental Literacy, there also exists Revitalizing K–12 Civic Learning in California: A Blueprint for Action. Taken together in a larger context, they represent a necessary paradigm shift in public education in California. As funding for the state’s school districts moves to local control, districts are increasingly empowered to make decisions about how to provide the best education for their students locally, in and with their communities. Superintendent Torlakson’s Blueprints highlight practices that include integrated learning, hands-on learning, service learning, learning beyond school walls, community partnerships, and equity of access for all students to a variety of educational experiences:

For all students in California to have access to a continuum of civic learning experiences starting in kindergarten—and to effectively respond to equity issues—we must embed robust civic learning throughout the K–12 experience, both within and beyond school walls. To this end, the Task Force makes the following system-wide recommendations to improve civic learning in every district, in every school, for every child.~Revitalizing K–12 Civic Learning in California: A Blueprint for Action

We must invest our very best thinking, our very best efforts, and—above all—our very best people in improving the quality and reach of student education for environmental literacy in California. We must do so for the future of our students and for California’s prosperity, equity, and resource sustainability…The central approach for achieving environmental literacy proposed by the Blueprint for Environmental Literacy is to integrate environmental literacy efforts into California’s increasingly coherent and aligned K–12 education landscape so that all teachers are given the opportunity to use the environment as context for teaching their core subjects. ~A Blueprint For Environmental Literacy: Educating Every California Student In, About, and For the

Environment


Two of our Bioneers panelists live and breathe the intent and implementation of the recommendations expressed above, on-the-ground, every day.

Jose Flores is a civics teacher, and powerful advocate for his students at Brawley Union High School, his alma mater (read more here). Collaborating with school administrators, the school district board of directors, EPA Region 9, state and local governing bodies, and the community-based nonprofit Comite Civico del Valle, Mr. Flores’ students participate in a variety of experiences, both in school and out, tailored to be relevant, engaging, and enriching. The goal is to empower student voices, encourage civic participation, and expand awareness, access, and opportunity:

“You have to have a voice. For the most part, our students are from ethnic groups that withdraw from democracy because they don’t see themselves as having a voice. I have 180 students; 90% of them attend all school board meetings and all city council meetings. They have a voice. They have buy-in. Having a voice, and going to these meetings, they can push back on issues of the economy, which in our area directly tie into environmental issues. The focus that we emphasize is college, career, and civic readiness. We need students and teachers to understand that you truly don’t civically engage unless you’re environmentally literate. And you’re not truly environmentally literate unless you’re civically engaged—it works both ways. ”

Juanita Chan is a former classroom teacher, now the District Science Lead at Rialto Unified. There, she has inspired a core group of over 50 teachers dedicated to illustrating that science and the environment can provide the real-world context that gives flavor to all other subjects. She has worked vigorously to infuse environmental education into all levels of K–12 curriculum, advocating for access to experiential learning for all Rialto students. Her passion and vibrance is palpable—the people on both sides of me lean forward in their seats, returning her enthusiasm via eye-contact and nods of agreement whenever she speaks. The model for success Ms. Chan shares finds its foundation in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). From there, valuing local context and the community’s unique perspective and skills fosters a culture of cooperation to create opportunities for students. The district prioritizes and supports teacher professional learning to integrate science and environment, and collaboratively strategizes with community stakeholders around identifying Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) goals and pathways to achieve them. Ms. Chan highlights the importance of responsiveness, flexibility, and ensuring that the focus remains on serving students:

“We have educational reforms in place, primarily the NGSS, and so we are using the NGSS to have these really tough conversations with our teachers—and not just our teachers but our administrators and our councillors as well—about social justice. About what is the intention of school. And if the intention of school is to really, truly serve all standards for all students then does our system set it up for every student to have that success? And if it doesn’t then we need to fix it.”

“All our students, to a person, are curious critical thinkers…but most have not completed high school. They are typically at 4th grade math, 7th grade reading [levels]. Many of our students are illiterate—even students that have a high school degree—and most of them have pretty negative associations with traditional schools and classrooms.” ~Raquel Pinderhughes

Dr. Raquel Rivera Pinderhughes has taught at San Francisco State University for the past 25 years, where she serves as Professor and Chair of Urban Studies & Planning. An activist scholar, her work focuses on improving quality of life and economic empowerment opportunities for low-income people and inner-city communities. She has directed urban and environmental education programs for incarcerated youth and adults, and developed green job training for low-income youth and adults throughout the country. In other words, Dr. Pinderhughes serves those who are direct evidence that a hierarchy of human value is still very much functioning in our society, and by default, our educational system. In other words, disproportionately people of color.

Her curriculum, Roots of Success, is used in 36 states and three countries, in sectors that run the gamut from universities, government, and nonprofit organizations to prisons and reentry programs. During the panel discussion, she informs us that the youth her programs serve are already experts on environmental issues. That folks from low-income communities are facing environmental problems and injustices every day, and know more than anybody sitting in this room. That it is the people with lived experience that are best equipped to name the most urgent problems and identify solutions. And that we are accountable to those who have been left out, left behind, let down. At some point while she’s speaking I notice I’m crying; I’m pretty certain it started between her first and second sentences.

“Our teachers provide students with material that is directly relevant to their lived experience, so that we front-and-center the experiences of low-income communities, communities of color, frontline, and fenceline communities. We get students excited about learning and about being in the classroom. We also strengthen academic skills, help people acquire new knowledge and skills, provide them with opportunities to apply what they’re learning in the classroom to real-world situations and challenges in a range of settings, and inspire them to become activists who want to improve conditions in their communities. We connect their education to employment. We are primarily preparing people for work because they are economically very insecure. We prepare them for over 125 different environmental careers.”

“As we face a serious threat to the survival of life on the planet, we are actually facing a new reality, which is: how do we bring all these movements together? Because we can’t afford to have 15 or 20 Earths to support our social activities. We have to come together and we have to manage to find new ways to bridge the gaps. I would say that as painful as this period has been with separate identities, we need to hold onto these separate identities—but to do it in a new way which is to bring the strength of our separate understandings of who we are together with a social movement that can unite the people as a species.” ~Carl Anthony

Somewhere between 10:00–11:00am on a sunny October Saturday morning in Northern California, the smoke was no longer in the air. The rain had come the day before. The dull orange smell of fire fed well on trees and our manufactured shapes, mixed with the chemicals dropped from the sky to contain the burning, was replaced by the smell of moist earth. In the morning I listened to Heather McGhee eloquently and powerfully call-out America’s long-standing system of racial oppression as the inspiration for Hitler’s Nuremberg Laws (read Whitman’s Hitler’s American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law). But I also heard her clear and impassioned hope for a version of this country where, in a nation of ancestral strangers, it is more possible, more likely than anyplace else on the planet that “here today, there is someone in this country claiming citizenship who has a tie to every single community on the globe. That is the ‘We the People’ that I can believe in.”

The movement has three basic roots: environmental activism, social justice initiatives, and indigenous cultures’ resistance to globalization, all of which have become intertwined. Collectively it expresses the needs of the majority of people on earth to sustain the environment, wage peace, democratize decision making and policy, reinvent public governance from the bottom up, and improve their lives—women, children, and the poor. Throughout history, armies, corporations, religious rulers, and political zealots have overpowered the majority world, which in our upside-down world we consider to be minorities. ~Paul Hawken

Tom Goldtooth (Dine’ and Dakota, Executive Director of the Indigenous Environmental Network, Recipient of the Gandhi Peace Award) has shared the Dakota concept of Mitkuye Oyasin—meaning we are all related. You are somewhere, right now, reading these words. Someplace close by, there are people working with passion and purpose to transform difficulty into opportunity; many communities have been doing this work for generations. We at Ten Strands and the ELSC do this work with deep appreciation and respect for this planet and all its inhabitants, with a focus on transforming education for California’s young people.

And there is a standing invitation to be involved, to listen, support, to practice exemplary action—to accompany.

This article was written by Kim Moon

Kim Moon has a background in communications, and over 20 years of experience in the education and nonprofit sectors. At the East Bay Community Foundation, she oversaw the creation, marketing, and management of the James Irvine Foundation’s Conference Center, which provides sliding-scale meeting space to community-based nonprofits. She later joined a small family fund where she oversaw project management, program development, securing funds for San Francisco Unified School District classrooms, and creating and supporting school gardens. She believes deeply in the power of young people, and is grateful for everything she has learned from them in her volunteer roles as mentor and tutor.

 

Elevating Nature: Milan’s Bosco Verticale

By Reid Coffman, MLA PhD

This piece was originally published by the Biophilic Cities Journal.

Finding nature in a high-rise apartment seems quixotic, but it may be just the biophilic injection dense cities need. After centuries of practice distinguishing the urbane from wilderness, a pair of residential high rises in Milan, Italy has flipped the paradigm by proposing a new social ecology within its building façade, and is providing an option for ultra-urban access to nature.

Bosco Verticale, designed by architect Stefano Boeri, opened in 2014 to provide residents with an alternative to suburban single-family neighborhoods. Boeri envisioned public exchange with neighbors occurring through a terrace-scape on the building’s exterior façade. In this space, residents would have views of nature, direct access to vegetation, and the opportunity for neighborly exchange about the pleasantries of gardening, plants, and wildlife. Relying on a compact intimacy of the gardening tradition, Bosco Verticale expands Milan’s cultural habits of terrace gardening into a community level asset that occurs as a forest on a building within the city.

View from the 20th floor
Photo Credit: Reid Coffman

The eighteen and twenty-six story tree-covered towers emerge from the historic stone and brick city as an aberration to the sculptured glass buildings flourishing today in Milan’s Porta Nuova district. Taking a closer look at the neighborhood, it is easy to see how Bosco’s 800 trees, 4,500 shrubs and 15,000 plants are an unfolding evolutionary adaptation of the local balcony gardening tradition.

New opportunity comes from how the terraces connect trees and people. By looking at the façade from the city, the overall terrace layout breaks regimented uniformity common in high-rise balconies to create a seemingly random visual condition. This design offers spaces that accommodate tree canopies while echoing the mysteries of larger systems that are at play.

The selection and arrangement of trees and vegetation creates neither landscape nor garden. It is a novel environment, a sort of phyto-scape or terrace-scape, if you will. More than simple balcony gardening, the setting provides an exposure to plants and wildlife inside and outside the building while delivering a shared set of ecological benefits including: beauty; mystery; light filtration; and air and temperature regulation.

View through neighbors’ trees
Photo Credit: Reid Coffman

It is rare to have an intimate experience with plants in a high-rise building, let alone one that is so exposed to the public. Through the windows, residents are continuously oriented at varying distances from trees and plants creating a feeling of being cloaked in nature. Yet, in the background, the city is alive with activity, creating an extremely uncommon association of nature in its context. For example, residents can sit at the kitchen table within a few inches of glossy green foliage and beautiful warm colored branches while, through the canopy, they can enjoy the view to the city streets filled with motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. This comforting prospect is enriched with the realization that the vegetation being enjoyed is not one’s own, but a neighbor’s.

The plants enjoyed through the windows are part of a much larger interdependent social experience. The tree canopies visible through windows are actually growing from a downstairs neighbor’s terrace and the tree planted on one’s terrace is enjoyed primarily by the upstairs neighbors. This overlapping creates a one-of-a-kind social ecological setting that exceeds anything found in the single-family home suburban garden.

The neighborhood context
Photo Credit: Stefano Boeri Architetti

The experience is magnified when standing outside on the terrace. Every terrace is more than an extension of private real estate. Stepping outside, one notices very few terraces align on the same floor creating a nice sense of privacy. Instead, diagonal views downward and upward offer views that prioritize the vegetation while composing a casual environment of chance encounter common in the city. These staggered, off-set terraces are where the neighborly discussions of plants, weather, and local community can begin.

The engineering systems that provide support, water, and nutrients to the trees and plants are equally unique. Structural planters contain light-weight designer growing media, irrigation tubing, and drainage pipes that service the plant roots while wires stabilize tree trunks to withstand extreme winds. All the plant material is maintained and stewarded by a team of professionals that is governed by a residential board making the entire façade a public space organized and operated by the community.

Photo Credit: Stefano Boeri Architetti

The settings at Bosco Verticale begin to defy current categorization. Using the term “garden” to describe these places is inaccurate, because gardens have traditional practices, orders, and narratives that fail to properly translate in these new settings. Bosco Verticale places humans in contact with nature, and subsequently other people, in a novel way to reveal the innovative potential of biophilic architecture. Other speculative projects offer similarly compellingly experiences that require translation and definition. At the building scale, Torre Rosewood by Ateliers Jean Nouvel (Sao Paulo, Brazil), Solaris at Fusionopolis by T.R. Hamzah & Ken Yeang (Singapore), and the M6B2 Tower of Biodiversity by Eduardo Francois (Paris, France) each aggressively address social and vegetative dynamics in the exterior façade and are far from being categorized as gardens. Meanwhile, at district scale, New Government City by Balmori Associates (Sejong, South Korea) is exploring how living architecture engages urban culture and politics and, if expressed beyond convention, could offer a larger language of urban nature. In creating innovate ways to engage nature, we must develop new verbal expressions and terminology to help explain the value and benefits of such experiences.

It turns out that growing a vertical forest on a building façade is a visionary, workable, and realistic form of biophilic architecture that can be a refreshing way of accessing nature in the densifying city.

Looking up from the public park
Photo Credit: Elijah Less

Reid Coffman is the Editor of the Journal of Living Architecture and an Associate Professor at Kent State University.

This piece was originally published by the Biophilic Cities Journal.

RESOURCES:

Journal of Living Architecture. Research. https://livingarchitecturemonitor.com/research.

M6B2 Tower of Biodiversity. Eduardo Francois. http://www.edouardfrancois.com/en/projects/towers/details/article/58/m6b2-tour-de-la-biodiversite/#.WplTKejwaUk.

New Government City. Balmori Associates. http://www.balmori.com/portfolio/new-government-city.

The Vertical Forest. Stefano Boeri Architetti. https://www.stefanoboeriarchitetti.net/en/portfolios/vertical-forest.

Torre Rosewood. Ateliers Jean Nouvel. http://www.jeannouvel.com/en/projects/torre-rosewood.

T. R. Hamzah & Ken Yeang (April 2014). Solaris at Fusionopolis. Greenroofs.com. http://www.greenroofs.com/content/articles/126-SOLARIS-at-Fusionopolis-2B-From-Military-Base-to-Bioclimatic-Eco-Architecture.htm#.WplVaejwaUk.